1) All we think is subjectively limited so all our thoughts - including doubts - are faith-based.
2) To truly be faith, there must be some doubt, otherwise it is either knowing with 100% certainty, or the belief of such & without the belief you could be wrong, you'd set yourself up for worshipping falsehoods.
Got no idea what point you're making or what question you are asking....do I need to have faith to understand you?
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
Amore wrote:1) All we think is subjectively limited so all our thoughts - including doubts - are faith-based.
2) To truly be faith, there must be some doubt, otherwise it is either knowing with 100% certainty, or the belief of such & without the belief you could be wrong, you'd set yourself up for worshipping falsehoods.
Hopes? Doubts?
Amore, I always enjoy your posts and insights...but....
the majority of readers here are not interested in (i.e. insulted by) self-inspection at the level you are suggesting. To admit that all things are uncertain inevitably concludes with several things being "possible"...and "possible" is the most devastating word to an atheist.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Bazooka, Come again in 10 years and maybe then you'll understand, I hope. Line upon line.
Subgenius, It was a shot in the nihilistic cult.
Seriously, though, my intent was/is to shed light on the fact that life is not black or white. No need to blindly believe any group mentality- Atheist or Mormon etc. And no need to succumb to depressingly consuming doubt that strips life of meaning. Even those who adhere to such meaningless bias are still exercising faith in such doubt, when they are as clueless as anybody else.
The way is narrow because most people want to join herd mentalities (including A-theism) rather than consider things independent of such loyalties.
Amore wrote:1) All we think is subjectively limited so all our thoughts - including doubts - are faith-based.
2) To truly be faith, there must be some doubt, otherwise it is either knowing with 100% certainty, or the belief of such & without the belief you could be wrong, you'd set yourself up for worshipping falsehoods.
Hopes? Doubts?
Thomas S. Monson
Faith and doubt cannot exist in the same mind at the same time, for one will dispel the other.
Joseph Smith's "Lectures on Faith" tells us that true faith requires certain knowledge (not the wishy washy definition of faith one typically hears), no doubt can exists for real/true mustard seed moving mountains level of faith to work.
So what say ye is the relationship of belief and faith?
Amore wrote:1) All we think is subjectively limited so all our thoughts - including doubts - are faith-based.
2) To truly be faith, there must be some doubt, otherwise it is either knowing with 100% certainty, or the belief of such & without the belief you could be wrong, you'd set yourself up for worshipping falsehoods.
Hopes? Doubts?
Thomas S. Monson
Faith and doubt cannot exist in the same mind at the same time, for one will dispel the other.
Someone does not agree with you.
I got a sense that the OP was noting how doubt is often the precursor to faith. ...or even that doubt itself is an act of faith. ... Or are you of the idea that the OP is suggesting some sorry of cognitive dissonance. ..or rather, spiritual dissonance?
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
subgenius wrote:I got a sense that the OP was noting how doubt is often the precursor to faith. ...or even that doubt itself is an act of faith. ... Or are you of the idea that the OP is suggesting some sorry of cognitive dissonance. ..or rather, spiritual dissonance?
subgenius wrote:I got a sense that the OP was noting how doubt is often the precursor to faith. ...or even that doubt itself is an act of faith. ... Or are you of the idea that the OP is suggesting some sorry of cognitive dissonance. ..or rather, spiritual dissonance?
It's only Mormon doubts that one should doubt though, right? If a Catholic has doubts about their faith because of what Mormon missionaries have told them, they should first doubt their doubts before doubting their Catholic faith, right?
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
subgenius wrote:I got a sense that the OP was noting how doubt is often the precursor to faith. ...or even that doubt itself is an act of faith. ... Or are you of the idea that the OP is suggesting some sorry of cognitive dissonance. ..or rather, spiritual dissonance?
It's only Mormon doubts that one should doubt though, right? If a Catholic has doubts about their faith because of what Mormon missionaries have told them, they should first doubt their doubts before doubting their Catholic faith, right?
I doubt that.
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
subgenius wrote:I got a sense that the OP was noting how doubt is often the precursor to faith. ...or even that doubt itself is an act of faith. ... Or are you of the idea that the OP is suggesting some sorry of cognitive dissonance. ..or rather, spiritual dissonance?
It's only Mormon doubts that one should doubt though, right? If a Catholic has doubts about their faith because of what Mormon missionaries have told them, they should first doubt their doubts before doubting their Catholic faith, right?
subgenius wrote:I doubt that.
That said, with the Book of Mormon, we are not dealing with a civilization with no written record. What we are dealing with is a written record with no civilization. (Runtu, Feb 2015)
Seek freedom and become captive of your desires...seek discipline and find your liberty I can tell if a person is judgmental just by looking at them what is chaos to the fly is normal to the spider - morticia addams If you're not upsetting idiots, you might be an idiot. - Ted Nugent
Faith and doubt cannot exist in the same mind at the same time, for one will dispel the other.
Monson has not really thought of this all that deeply. I believe his motivation is to keep membership numbers high. You do this by discouraging reflection and inquiry. the gospel as presented by the church is a 100 miles wide and 2 inches deep.
Amore wrote:1) All we think is subjectively limited so all our thoughts - including doubts - are faith-based.
2) To truly be faith, there must be some doubt, otherwise it is either knowing with 100% certainty, or the belief of such & without the belief you could be wrong, you'd set yourself up for worshipping falsehoods.
Hopes? Doubts?
I get it, Amore. Your point is well taken and thanks for sharing.
Perhaps it's like Harry Potter's thestrals. Only those of us with certain experiences can comprehend and to those that don't comprehend, no amount of trying to explain on our part will help them see what we see.
I am extremely grateful for my doubts, for without them I would not understand my faith.
It's in no way easy to embrace paradoxes that we are. Accept imperfection, but strive for better... It's so tempting for me to just strive for better, but then my criticalness drives me & those I project it onto, crazy.
Then again, if I just accept everthing without striving, no progress is made and problems can become worse in the attempts at denial.
RockSlider wrote:Joseph Smith's "Lectures on Faith" tells us that true faith requires certain knowledge (not the wishy washy definition of faith one typically hears), no doubt can exists for real/true mustard seed moving mountains level of faith to work.
So what say ye is the relationship of belief and faith?
Good question.
If faith can move mountains - or at least have some influence as quantum physics suggests - then ideally, it is carefully directed. This implies the need of testing, doubt.
Belief seems to be repeated thought that affects action, so some degree of active faith.
RockSlider wrote:Joseph Smith's "Lectures on Faith" tells us that true faith requires certain knowledge (not the wishy washy definition of faith one typically hears), no doubt can exists for real/true mustard seed moving mountains level of faith to work.
So what say ye is the relationship of belief and faith?
Good question.
If faith can move mountains - or at least have some influence as quantum physics suggests - then ideally, it is carefully directed. This implies the need of testing, doubt.
Belief seems to be repeated thought that affects action, so some degree of active faith.
Nothing in quantum physics suggests that faith moves or influences mountains. It does, however, move money from one person to another.
“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”
― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
If faith can move mountains - or at least have some influence as quantum physics suggests - then ideally, it is carefully directed. This implies the need of testing, doubt.
Belief seems to be repeated thought that affects action, so some degree of active faith.
Nothing in quantum physics suggests that faith moves or influences mountains. It does, however, move money from one person to another.