More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6576
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Philo Sofee »

https://www.sltrib.com/religion/2020/09 ... 20to%20see.

He deserves every bit of it. His agenda is heinous, his scholarship sophomoric, and he has become a liability to LDS credibility in ways that even surpasses the kings themselves, Daniel C. Peterson and Lou Midgley. We have now the ability to identify the Mormon 3 Stooges.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
Shulem
Son of Perdition
Posts: 11910
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Shulem »

APOSTATE Egyptologist John Gee goes down.

Budge must be laughing at him from the grave because Gee is now the NEW laughing stalk of Egyptology and the butt of jokes!


Image

Congratulations, Gee. You win the prize!

:lol:

User avatar
Shulem
Son of Perdition
Posts: 11910
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Shulem »

Image


1. What's the king's name in Facsimile No. 3? ________________________ (Write the name on the line, John.)

2. How do you spell Shulem? ________________________ (Write it just like Abraham did, John.)

3. Who hacked off jackal-eyed Anubis's nose? ______________________ (Who did it, John?)



John Gee: The world's worst Egyptologist. He spent too much time with his rubric cube.

User avatar
Kishkumen
Seedy Academician
Posts: 21266
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Kishkumen »

The problem with a bad review from Jana Riess is that someone can always claim she is just responding predictably to criticism of her book.
"Petition wasn’t meant to start a witch hunt as I’ve said 6000 times." ~ Hanna Seariac, LDS apologist

User avatar
Shulem
Son of Perdition
Posts: 11910
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Shulem »

It appears that John Gee has the support of the Church bishopric from days gone by. Get this, and yes, I'm not making up:
BISHOP VICTOR L. BROWN, Second Counselor in the Presiding Bishopric April 1970 Conference wrote: Pornography has become a major industry in many parts of the world. The chief psychotherapist at one of Washington's largest hospitals says, "A normal 12- or 13-year-old boy or girl exposed to pornographic literature could develop into a homosexual. You can take healthy boys or girls and by exposing them to abnormalities virtually crystallize and settle their habits for the rest of their lives."
And then this:
ELDER BERNARD P. BROCKBANK, October 1971 Conference wrote:Fornication and homosexual acts are inspired by the devil and are grievous sins in the sight of God. Fornication and adultery will destroy man's Godlike potential and bring man nearer the lower animal status.
I'm a GODDAMN animal! Woof, woof, woof!!

Then there was this horrible shaming:
BISOP VAUGHN J. FEATHERSTONE, Second Counselor in the Presiding Bishopric Conference April 1975 wrote:I am going to use a visual aid tonight. But we don't have one, so, in your mind's eye, wherever you are across the far corners of the earth, would you picture a huge scroll sliding down from the ceiling? On it are listed the names of those who purchased pornographic literature. The list is large enough so that all may see. Is your name on the list?

Did you buy a Playboy magazine or some other piece of pornographic literature? Now suppose those names are removed, and the names of all those who attended or viewed x-rated movies are presented so that all who are in the congregation may see. Again, is your name on the list?

Now, my young friends, and I am sorry to say, many adults, how about all those of you who have a masturbation problem? If the names of those who had the problem were projected across this big, huge scroll, would your name be there, or would you be able to sit back confident and pure in heart?
I'm damn glad to be OUT of the Cult. I proudly proclaim that I've broken my temple covenants and mock Mormon god daily.

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6576
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Philo Sofee »

Idiot amateur pop psychology. This is what leaders demonstrate, and love to present it as revelation to them alone from God.
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

User avatar
Shulem
Son of Perdition
Posts: 11910
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:48 pm

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Shulem »

Philo Sofee wrote:
Wed Sep 16, 2020 6:22 pm
Idiot amateur pop psychology. This is what leaders demonstrate, and love to present it as revelation to them alone from God.
Image

Bishop Featherstone would like to interview you, Philo Sofee, to determine if you're worthy -- haven't touched yourself. What's being shown on that big view screen?

Oh my. Are you guilty of something? Featherstone will get to the bottom of it!

:lol:

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6576
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: More Reviews Demonstrate John Gee's Research Just Sucks

Post by Philo Sofee »

Well, yes.......it's because I want to sin and look at porn........ I have learned through experience that those who obsess about sin and porn are themselves completely hooked on it...... church leaders no longer fool us as they used to.....
Dr CamNC4Me
"Dr. Peterson and his Callithumpian cabal of BYU idiots have been marginalized by their own inevitable irrelevancy defending a fraud."

Post Reply