Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
User avatar
Gadianton
Hermit
Posts: 9949
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:12 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Gadianton »

Mr. Midgley wrote:He may have read some of them. But intellectual history? Never? Hence all that gemli blather about thousands of Gods and hundreds of religions
Analytic philosophers aren't big on "intellectual history". Wittgenstein didn't rely on Aquinas any more the Gemli does. Wittgenstein owned a few Western novels and that's it, and he tried to tell his friends to resign from academia. Given Coach P. is an "avowed anglophile", you'd think he and his buddies could combat Gemli and toe the right party line at the same time. Perhaps Gemli could benefit from a primer here and there on his topics of interest, but a deep dive into historical thought while valuable for its own sake, is not prerequisite for the kind of theorizing at home at Oxford.

Ironically, the approaches to theorizing at home within the New MI; Critical Theory, Deconstruction etc., take the literary approach that Midgley recommends.

Lemmie
God
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Lemmie »

Recall Peterson’s agreement w Dr. Moore ?

Louis Midgley • 20 hours ago • edited

When Professor Peterson blogs about Islam, which I very much appreciate, I always learn new things. Whenever Moksha comments on such matters, he always emotes, and hence also seems uninterested in or unable to learn.

Could this be the product of Moksha being socialized on the rabid Shades board? Please note that Shades has boasted that he teaches his inmates "correct principles" and they then govern themselves. I think Shades wrongly flatters himself about what he teaches, encourages and exemplifies, or at least tolerates. We have recently learned much about his own ideology, and disposition, by noting what he upvotes.

However, it is more likely that Shades is not responsible for the amusing and disgusting performance of Moksha, and others who emite on his board. Instead, he merely attracts those already of a certain disposition.

http://disq.us/p/29m8faz
Midgley is still going on about upvotes, but the bolding is to note his projection of behalf of Peterson. ( See threads documenting McGregor’s use of the N word, and Peterson’s toleration of it.)


Moksha Louis Midgley • 9 hours ago

Louis, Dan and I were quoting some lines of poetry by Leonard Cohen. As far as downvotes from you and Kiwi, I understand the two of you must respect the demands of your inner demons.


——
Louis Midgley Moksha • 9 hours ago

Moksha: Of course you quoted some lovely poetry, and then went right back to blowing snot--that is, sneering at the faith of Latter-day Saints.


——
Moksha Louis Midgley • 8 hours ago

Blowing snot and sneering at faith? Louis, you not only have a cacophonous way with words, but a propensity to see things that are not there. Why must you always throw stones? The best way to meet your later years is with a Christ-like attitude.


——
Kiwi57 Moksha • 7 hours ago

Still preaching what you never practice, I see.

I notice you chose to ignore my offer to help you make peace with Louis. I take it you prefer not to put your money where your mouth is?
Kiwi is behind the times. The money offered to the Interpeter is long gone. The behaviors of McGregor, Midgley and Peterson have seen to that.

User avatar
malkie
God
Posts: 2663
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 5:03 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by malkie »

I'll be surprised if moksha doesn't see the value in taking kiwi57 up on his offer.

McGregor is the perfect exemplar of Christ-like behaviour, and how to make peace.

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

I noticed the Midge, who obsessively follows this board, took me up on my offer wherein if he only referred to users by the proper usernames for one month I’d go back and change all my references to him to his proper name.

He lasted for a day.

- Doc

Lemmie
God
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Lemmie »

Louis Midgley Moksha • 16 hours ago

Moksha: Of course you quoted some lovely poetry, and then went right back to blowing snot--that is, sneering at the faith of Latter-day Saints.


—-
Moksha Louis Midgley • 15 hours ago
Blowing snot and sneering at faith? Louis, you not only have a cacophonous way with words, but a propensity to see things that are not there. Why must you always throw stones? The best way to meet your later years is with a Christ-like attitude.


——
Louis Midgley Moksha 4 hours ago

I was not aware that anyone needs advice from Moksha on what he calls "a Christ-like attitude."

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 4936396236
I am laughing so hard I can barely type. “Blowing snot and sneering at faith.” Is that not Midgley in a nutshell?

And oh yes, Lou-Lou the Midge-faced Manboy, we ALL know that you are NOT aware who needs advice on their attitude.

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Lou-Lou the Midge-faced Manboy seems utterly beholden to the disqus upvote/downvote system:

“If you give it a try, we will support you. The downvotes will disappear. You don't really need the applause from the Dark side.”

Lolol. The idea the Keeviler Elf is sitting in his bungalow fuming over fake internet points is just too much. Lol.

- Doc

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Philo Sofee »

Midgley is like Donald Trump, he always attacks those who make the powerful points against his stance on all subjects. Moksha refutes Midgley at every turn, and so in Midgley's childish snotty Mormonism he lashes out and attacks the one who can stand toe to toe with him and show how utterly inane he really is. Moksha bests Peterson and Midgley constantly, it is why they attack him, and invent all kinds of things to refute him which just don't stick. Moksha owns them. The dynamic duo (no not Batman and Robin, Donald and Mike wannabes) is no match for Superman Moksha.

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

My LORD Lou-Lou the Midge-faced Manbaby just can’t stand any sort of levity. In response to a kind of funny joke relating to housing missionaries with members the Keeviler Elf loses his damn mind:

Moksha cleverly joked, “Hasn't this been done before and discarded as an undesirable practice? I know in the American Colonies there was widespread disapproval with the practice of quartering British troops.”

The Midge blowing snot frothed, “Dan: This really stupid remark by Moksha seems to me to be more than sufficient grounds for giving him the boot. Moksha comments only to irritate. I am confident that I am not alone in not desiring to see this kind of rubbish start pointless quarrels. If we had a vote, Moksha would be gone in an instant.”

It seems the mainly quarrelsome one there is him.

- Doc

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Omg. I wiping tears away from my eyes (but that’s primarily due to seasonal allergies):

“Moksha: I counted fake Dr. Shades upvotes, not downvotes, of the truly, unwarranted, nasty, disgusting things what were packed into the comments about me by you and others from the Sty who took over the Kiwi Mormon blog. Those upvotes constitute solid evidence--even proof--that Dr. Shakes is himself in full agreement with the rubbish in those comments.”

He counted Dr. Shades’ upvotes. Lolol. That ____’ old codger fuming away in his bunker counting fake Internet points. Lolol.

What a rube.

- Doc

User avatar
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 6660
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 3:04 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Philo Sofee »

Mormonism and its apologists, all about image and no substance. No wonder he wastes his time counting up and down votes. They want everyone to see the magnificent future deityhood, only right now, here on earth. They are so impatient of worship and praise then. They want it now. All hail the future Elohims!

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

The Keeviler Elf continues to stew over Moksha’s clever joke about housing missionaries:

“This stupid and insulting "comment" by Moksha is grounds for his being given the boot, is it not?”

Like. He commented yesterday, but that wasn’t good enough. Moksha’s joke embedded so deeply into Lou Lou’s fragile psyche he, a full day later, continues to beg his handler to finally ban Moksha.

- Doc

Temp. Admin.
Deacon
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 9:50 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Temp. Admin. »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 11:54 am
The Keeviler Elf continues to stew over Moksha’s clever joke about housing missionaries:

“This stupid and insulting "comment" by Moksha is grounds for his being given the boot, is it not?”

Like. He commented yesterday, but that wasn’t good enough. Moksha’s joke embedded so deeply into Lou Lou’s fragile psyche he, a full day later, continues to beg his handler to finally ban Moksha.
Will you please post the URL to that comment? It requires a response.

Lemmie
God
Posts: 10590
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2015 1:25 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Lemmie »

Oh my god.
Louis Midgley Charles • an hour ago

Charles: If your wife happens to be a devout Latter-day Saint, then all of us will feel deep sorrow for her. This is just the way normal human beings react to these kinds of situations, is it not? There is nothing at all "creepy" about such things. It is what a normal human being feels for the family and friends of one killed by a bad cop, is it not?


—-
Charles Louis Midgley • an hour ago

Louis Midgley: "It is what a normal human being feels for the family and friends of one killed by a bad cop, is it not?"

I'm having a difficult time understanding Lou's analogy. Does Lou fee the "bad cop" is the church? Hopefully, Lou will clarify.


—-
Louis Midgley Charles • an hour ago • edited

Charles: I was merely trying to explain why I genuinely feel sorrow for Gina's husband. Why would you imagine that I had the Church of Jesus Christ in mind with my an simple little analogy? I now very strongly urge you to cease commenting and, if you simply must opine, then please do it somewhere else.

http://disq.us/p/29o49hf
What the HELL is wrong with Midgley?

No, midge, that is NOT how normal human beings feel! And yes, you are a creep.

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

[quote="Temp. Admin." post_id=1226801 time=1591139497 user_id=19208]
[quote="Doctor CamNC4Me" post_id=1226722 time=1591120459 user_id=3779]The Keeviler Elf continues to stew over Moksha’s clever joke about housing missionaries:

“This stupid and insulting "comment" by Moksha is grounds for his being given the boot, is it not?”

Like. He commented yesterday, but that wasn’t good enough. Moksha’s joke embedded so deeply into Lou Lou’s fragile psyche he, a full day later, continues to beg his handler to finally ban Moksha.[/quote]
Will you please post the URL to that comment? It requires a response.
[/quote]

http://disq.us/p/29nwixl

User avatar
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 21663
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Lyin' Lou Midgley posts another whopper:

"... Decolonizing Mormonism: Approaching a Postcolonial Zion (2018).

One of the things that I have discussed with Dr. Nathan McCluskey, Gina Colvin's husband was whether I was planning on writing something about his wife. And I said that I have actually begun to draft a scathing review of some portions of this book. But that I have lost interest in finishing my essay because Gina has now lost credibility with the Latter-day Saint audience by becoming an Anglican lay preacher of some sort, and joining the now dying Community of Christ--that is, that new sinking ship."

Not only does he claim he is best buddies with Gina Colvn's husband, but he's now claiming they're such good friends that they've 'discussed a few things', AND he let Gina Colvin's husband know he was drafting a scathing review of her book mentioned in the quote above.

The absolute fatuous mongrel thinks he can drive a wedge between Gina and her husband by lying about his relationship with him. It's utterly vile and perverse behavior.

- Doc

User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 4056
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:53 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

Lying Louey:

"... Decolonizing Mormonism: Approaching a Postcolonial Zion (2018). One of the things that I have discussed with Dr. Nathan McCluskey, Gina Colvin's husband was whether I was planning on writing something about his wife. And I said that I have actually begun to draft a scathing review of some portions of this book. But that I have lost interest in finishing my essay because Gina has now lost credibility with the Latter-day Saint audience by becoming an Anglican lay preacher of some sort, and joining the now dying Community of Christ--that is, that new sinking ship."

Fibber Mcgee Midgley has completely lost his marbles. Peter$on can’t control him and he just keeps digging and digging himself In deeper.

User avatar
Gadianton
Hermit
Posts: 9949
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:12 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Gadianton »

An informant directed me to this thread, where Mr. Midgley says:
Well it seems that someone who hides his identity behind the sneering handle Gadianton P. Robbers disagrees. The first time I was confronted by this jerk was on the Kiwi Mormon blog. Disgusting. Nothing more can be said about this one.
Wow, that's a spirited reaction to my mere down-vote of a comment that wasn't even by one of his buddies.

I guess I'm a little surprised he feels this way, since on the Kiwi Mormon blog I was very respectful in my interaction with him. I must have made him think, since he changed his response to my question to him at least once.

User avatar
Dr LOD
Teacher
Posts: 244
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2019 12:24 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Dr LOD »

"... Decolonizing Mormonism: Approaching a Postcolonial Zion (2018). One of the things that I have discussed with Dr. Nathan McCluskey, Gina Colvin's husband was whether I was planning on writing something about his wife. And I said that I have actually begun to draft a scathing review of some portions of this book. But that I have lost interest in finishing my essay because Gina has now lost credibility with the Latter-day Saint audience by becoming an Anglican lay preacher of some sort, and joining the now dying Community of Christ--that is, that new sinking ship."
Gee Midge, you are so full of BS. I can guarantee you that both women do still have credibility, and their opinions do hold some weight with Church Authorities in a positive way. In fact I had a phone call yesterday with a GA which was mainly about a medical question, but this GA did mention the book by Brooks, as something I should look up, as we were engaged in small talk.

Neither of those two individuals were removed by church leadership from a university sanctioned position as you were. You have the credibility problem.

User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 8025
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:44 am

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Doctor Scratch »

Gadianton wrote:
Tue Jun 02, 2020 7:06 pm
An informant directed me to this thread, where Mr. Midgley says:
Well it seems that someone who hides his identity behind the sneering handle Gadianton P. Robbers disagrees. The first time I was confronted by this jerk was on the Kiwi Mormon blog. Disgusting. Nothing more can be said about this one.
Wow, that's a spirited reaction to my mere down-vote of a comment that wasn't even by one of his buddies.

I guess I'm a little surprised he feels this way, since on the Kiwi Mormon blog I was very respectful in my interaction with him. I must have made him think, since he changed his response to my question to him at least once.
Am I mistaken, Dr. Robbers, or were you banned over that innocuous remark? American society is in turmoil at the moment over many, many years of racism, and Dr. Peterson's good friend is using the "N-word" on his blog, and that is allowed to stand, and yet you are banned for merely stating your academic title?

User avatar
Gadianton
Hermit
Posts: 9949
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 11:12 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Gadianton »

Coach P implied that I'd been banned for correcting Mr. Midgley in his manner of addressing me -- I informed him to address me as "Dean". That's the second comment I've ever made over there, and so it could be months or years before I can say whether or not I really am banned. It's possible that he chickened out at the last moment. Remember how he banned Dr. Moore and Dr. LOD and then freaked out and unbanned them but something went wrong and the reversal didn't work right, and then he lied and said he'd never banned them?

But yeah, wow, they went nuts on this one eh? I'm sure they are a little nervous that I might actually start posting. On the Kiwi blog, I asked Midgley some probing questions -- no insults. He replied in several paragraphs and then erased the whole thing and wrote something totally different. He knew I'd corner him and avoid giving him an easy way out by resorting to insults. Bear in mind, I've never called Mr. Midgley a name, nor have I used the word "stalker" to describe his activities, and yet, one would think I'm the most terrible person he'd ever met. He was so bent out of shape, that he said I was probably in charge of a "garbage truck"- lol - good one! That's one hell of a wit he's got!

A garbage truck on a good route would command far more than his salary as a professor, by the way. A guy in my home ward in the bishopric had his own truck and operated it personally, and he wasn't doing too bad.

Coach P, of course, doesn't want me posting substance over there for sure; better nip it in the bud. He's been down that road. :)

Temp. Admin.
Deacon
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2018 9:50 pm

Re: Rules of Patheos: Midgley appears to violate TOS 10x

Post by Temp. Admin. »

Louis Midgley wrote:One of the things that I have discussed with Dr. Nathan McCluskey, Gina Colvin's husband was whether I was planning on writing something about his wife. And I said that I have actually begun to draft a scathing review of some portions of this book. But that I have lost interest in finishing my essay because Gina has now lost credibility with the Latter-day Saint audience by becoming an Anglican lay preacher of some sort, and joining the now dying Community of Christ--that is, that new sinking ship."
OH. MY. GOSH.

Yeah, I'm sure Dr. Nathan McCluskey is still "fast friends" with Midgley after hearing that. How on Earth could he not be?

Doctor Scratch, I'd be surprised if Midgley does not account for a full 50% of the future items in the upcoming "Top Ten Happenings in Mopologetics, 2020" edition.

To be frank, I don't think I've ever wished for anyone to live a longer life than I wish for Midgley to live. In spite of the fact that he's 94 years old, I pray that he tarries with us for a very, very long time to come. The man is an absolute goldmine.

Post Reply