William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Will Schryver · **Joined:** Sat Feb 19, 2011 12:12 pm **Posts:** 438

Kevin Graham wrote:

You've denied attacking many people you've attacked, so I'm inclined to accept Bokovoy's claim.

As I suspected, there is no evidence to support the allegations.

Nothing new about that ...

And, on that note, I'll take my leave once again. I'm sure you'll be able to carry on without me.

Kevin Graham · **Joined:** Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:44 pm **Posts:** 4862

Will Schryver wrote:

Kevin Graham wrote:

You've denied attacking many people you've attacked, so I'm inclined to accept Bokovoy's claim.

As I suspected, there is no evidence to support the allegations.

Nothing new about that ...

And, on that note, I'll take my leave once again. I'm sure you'll be able to carry on without me.

The fact that a credible scholar has accused a proven liar, who has a history of doing that exact thing, is evidence in and of itself. Testimony evidence is evidence the same as document evidence.

Dr. Shades · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:37 pm

Kevin Graham wrote:

You attack anyone who doesn't gleefully accept your crackpot theories. William Law would be proud (except for your cowardice, of course)

Wait, what? Forgive the momentary derail, but what was William Law's crackpot theory, and who did he attack who didn't accept it?

Buffalo · **Posted:** Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:05 am

Bumping for curious lurkers from MAD.

Doctor CamNC4Me · **Joined:** Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am **Posts:** 4531

Will Schryver wrote:

P.S. Are you always this bland? Or have you exceeded your recommended daily allowance of Xanax today?

Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

Nomad · **Joined:** Sat Feb 21, 2009 1:07 pm **Posts:** 504

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:

Will Schryver wrote:

P.S. Are you always this bland? Or have you exceeded your recommended daily allowance of Xanax today?

Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

Will Schryver never said any such thing. I'm sure you know it too. You are a shameful liar.

Runtu · **Posted:** Thu Apr 14, 2011 5:44 pm

Nomad wrote:

Will Schryver never said any such thing. I'm sure you know it too. You are a shameful liar.

I've never seen a citation for this, either, so I'll CFR for this statement attributed to William.

I have a feeling we're going to see more of you over the next week or so. ;-)

Doctor Scratch · **Posted:** Fri Jul 20, 2012 12:11 pm

Bump.

Ludd · **Joined:** Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:31 pm **Posts:** 332

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:

Will Schryver wrote:

P.S. Are you always this bland? Or have you exceeded your recommended daily allowance of Xanax today?

Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

I agree that this is rather offensive. Where is the link to this statement?

Doctor Scratch · **Posted:** Fri Jul 20, 2012 1:26 pm

Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?

beastie · **Joined:** Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:26 pm **Posts:** 12420

Doctor Scratch wrote:

Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?

LOL. Any doubts I once had about Ludd being a Schryver sock puppet are now erased. It's Schryver, no doubt.

TrashcanMan79 · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:18 pm **Posts:** 737

Ludd wrote:

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:

Mr. William "My wife is the kind of woman you'd have to masturbate to" Schryver attacks, yet again, the nicest guy on the board.

V/R
Dr. Cam

I agree that this is rather offensive. Where is the link to this statement?

What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?

Bob Loblaw · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:26 pm **Posts:** 2153

TrashcanMan79 wrote:

What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?

A better question is what is more offensive about this statement than the others?

Ludd · **Joined:** Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:31 pm **Posts:** 332

Doctor Scratch wrote:

Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?

Because working up the page here, it was the first thing I found.

Why do you think I singled it out, Doctor Kishkumen?

TrashcanMan79 · **Joined:** Sat Jun 02, 2007 4:18 pm **Posts:** 737

Bob Loblaw wrote:

TrashcanMan79 wrote:

What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?

A better question is what is more offensive about this statement than the others?

Exactly my point.

Ludd · **Joined:** Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:31 pm **Posts:** 332

beastie wrote:

Doctor Scratch wrote:

Among all of Will's references to "masturbation" and/or viewing women in a sexual light, this is the one you choose to single out, Ludd? Why is that, I wonder? I mean, *I* already know the answer, but why don't you fill us in?

LOL. Any doubts I once had about Ludd being a Schryver sock puppet are now erased. It's Schryver, no doubt.

???????

How exactly is it you reached this conclusion?

Ludd · **Joined:** Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:31 pm **Posts:** 332

TrashcanMan79 wrote:

Ludd wrote:

What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?

I think it's an inappropriate thing to say about one's wife. Don't you?

Ludd · **Joined:** Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:31 pm **Posts:** 332

Bob Loblaw wrote:

TrashcanMan79 wrote:

What do you find so offensive about this, Ludd?

A better question is what is more offensive about this statement than the others?

I think it's substantially more offensive than other quotes I read from Schryver. That's why I asked for the link, to make sure it's not like other things I've seen here: allegations without evidence. Apparently it is, otherwise someone would have provided a link.

Bob Loblaw · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:26 pm **Posts:** 2153

Ludd wrote:

I think it's substantially more offensive than other quotes I read from Schryver. That's why I asked for the link, to make sure it's not like other things I've seen here: allegations without evidence.

Why is it "substantially more offensive"?

Ludd · **Joined:** Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:31 pm **Posts:** 332

Bob Loblaw wrote:

Ludd wrote:

I think it's substantially more offensive than other quotes I read from Schryver. That's why I asked for the link, to make sure it's not like other things I've seen here: allegations without evidence.

Why is it "substantially more offensive"?

Why do I get the feeling you're just trying to create a diversion here? Is it because there isn't a link for this quote? Unbelieveable! Another example of a lie that you all believe just because someone said it was true...

Bob Loblaw · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:26 pm **Posts:** 2153

Ludd wrote:

Why do I get the feeling you're just trying to create a diversion here? Is it because there isn't a link for this quote? Unbelieveable! Another example of a lie that you all believe just because someone said it was true...

CFR my saying I believe it.

William Schryver - The Vulgar Scatologist of LDS Apologetics

Who is online