Update for 07/26/2010: Added the clarifying phrase "on this site" to Universal Rule #7.

"posting links to illegal information"

What is "illegal" information?

Child porn.

Shades,

I think people need to be held accountable for their accusations. I think a rule should be as follows:

"Making accusations without hard evidence for those accusations is not allowed, especially if the method of proving innocence has been made absolutely impossible is not allowed."

I think the situation is unfair. They are accusing me of being SI with no more than matrixing methodology, and providing me no method of disproving them. This technically could cause a legal liability against the board.

JMS

joseph smith CAIN wrote: " They are accusing me of being SI with no more than matrixing methodology, and providing me no method of disproving them."

Hey guy, as far as I can see NO one has accused you of being Sports Illustrated. You are once again suffering from delusions of grandeur.

Can we talk about what happens in the Celelstial room in the temple in the Terestrial forumn?

I am just joking, thanks for this awesome forumn. As a former Mormon who is still very interested in church affairs I love open discussions about the church!

The message provide us a details of guide line.
I think people need to be held accountable for their accusations.

"[MODERATOR NOTE: Mocnarf, if you wish to have a picture of overt temple content as part of your signature line, you'll have to limit yourself to only posting in the Telestial Forum. Is that a limitation you're willing to accept?]"

I'm new here and was reading these rules and was wondering what is overt temple content exactly? I've never heard that term before.

Have you "taken out your endowments" in an LDS temple? If so, then you may not reveal or discuss what you learned there in any forum other than the Telestial Forum.

In other words, the things you did and learned there are "overt temple content."

ok, thank you for explaining :)

Update for 01/17/2011: Added clarifiers to include a person's family members under the "personal attacks" provisos. Also added a second rule to the rules for the Telestial Forum that no personal attacks against a person's family members are allowed there, either.

Dr. Shades,

I'm wondering if you approve of or are even aware of this moderator action taken:

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=6747&view=previous


It seems very anti-free speech and not libertarian, as well as a textbook case of unnecessary censorship and MAD moderating.

Thanks in advance,

Soso