Doctor Scratch wrote:
Where? Where did I say that I planned to do that? And why is it that you think that "there is no way" to find out who you are via a phone call or two? Or a series of emails? That just doesn't make sense, Simon.
It is an intimidation tactic that you often use. It is part of the game that you play here, and it will not work on me.
In fact, there are a lot of things about your story that don't add up. E.g., you at first claimed to be the IT director, only to later backpedal
If you think backpedaling is what I did, perhaps you should make yourself familiar with the term. I am
an IT director.
and admit that there are, in actuality, several people who hold the title of "director."
Perhaps I gave you too much credit for knowing how organizations are, well, organized. You really should get out more.
Could it be that you were lying on the spot to Liz, and then going back to change your story when you had to?
Could it be that your whole persona here is one big giant fat lie? I think so, unless your name is "Doctor Scratch" and you work at "Cassius University" and you've published "75 articles." You are not allowed to call others liars when you are probably the largest one here.
I noticed, too, on your Amplus Thread, that Sock Puppet asked you if you knew "David Taylor." You answered, "No," which in retrospect seems really strange, since "David Taylor" is the CIO and VP of [deleted]. At the very least, you'd know who he was.
Did I say that I did not know who he was? Before you answer, you might want to read the thread in question.
So, were you lying? That certainly seems to be the case.
Here's a little exercise for you, Scratch. Go back and see if I ever
stated that I lived in Stamford, before you told me I lived in Stamford. Go ahead... the answer may reveal more about you than you realize.
No, Simon---*you* were the one who brought it up.
The only thing I brought up was that I was an IT guy. Then I said that [deleted] was really nice.
There's a difference between laying out a hypothetical scenario vs. making a threat. But your paranoia has been duly noted.
Your childish intimidation tactics are duly noted.
Sure. I'll do that right after you post an abstract for one of your Joseph Smith articles.
They aren't yet published. Yours are. There is a difference. Perhaps you'd like to remove the "75 articles published" bullcrap from your blog, then.
P.s. Do you think I should include an entry for jskains on The Encyclopedia of Mopologetics?
If you really think that jskains is an apologist
who is a threat to you in some way, then go ahead.
Edit: I've been patiently awaiting mine for some time now. You are really slow! MST is beating you by leaps and bounds.
P.p.s. Did that quote I posted ring any bells for you?
No, because there wasn't a question in it.