Your posts have now reached complete absurdity, Droops.
Have they now?
First you write what is obviously a sexually suggestive (and insulting) "poem" about Beastie.
The song was not about Beastie. Try taking a look at it first. Secondly, there were no sexual references. ...pants on fire, how does that go? I've already explained myself. I now see why you find this place so much more comfortable than the MADboard.
When called on it, you claim it was not sexually suggestive, and claim that the interpretation of a poem is up to you, which is rather the opposite of what real poets tend to claim.
I also know what intellectual poseurs tend to do. You have found your home here consig, just like lostindc and so many others.
Then instead of saying what a real human being
I've never claimed to be a real human being. I'm the Six Million Dollar Apologist. Better, stronger, faster...
would say in response to Beastie's completely understandable (because it really was intended by you, after all) interpretation of your poem (i.e., "I'm sorry"), you go on and on with further insults of Beastie.
Welcome to the Trailerpark consig. Y'all come back now, hear?
Bottom line--your initial insult of Beastie has somehow in your own mind provided you the basis to continue insulting Beastie.
Telling the truth, even in a satirical manner, of what is obvious - that Beastie has had pearls and treated them as fodder, is hardly an insult.
Do you have any concept how sick and pathetic your behavior is?
No, but that's probably only because I've never been in attendance at any of your graduate level gospel doctrine classes.