Ceeboo wrote:
I think I'll just pass - on all of it.
Peace,
Ceeboo
The only smart thing you've done.
Ceeboo wrote:
I think I'll just pass - on all of it.
Peace,
Ceeboo
Chap wrote:Now , if you can bear to stop talking about yourself for a moment or two
do you have anything to say about what I said above on the topic of the thread?
Chap wrote:I am certainly sorry that anybody who is not well-off and secure can have been foolish and naïvely credulous enough to have voted for Trump and then to have expected that he would make good things happen to them.
But, y'know, they are also lucky in a way. Because this is a learning opportunity for them, isn't it? So in a way, they also deserve congratulations for their good fortune. Like good Republicans, they will surely know how to use this experience to be even more self-reliant than ever.
You know who I am really, truly sorry for, though? The majority of voting Americans, who voted Clinton but got Trump
Ceeboo wrote:I think your political glasses are preventing you form be able to sympathize - or have empathy for - human beings and their families that are facing the loss of a job.
Ceeboo wrote:In other words, to extend your sympathy to - or to have compassion and empathy for - other human beings - ought to be cemented in and directly because of the position that they find themselves in.
If we terminate our sympathy and empathy toward other human beings because we find them to be "foolish" or "naïvely credulous enough to have voted for Trump" then we are, in this case, terminating sympathy and empathy to each and every one of the over 65 million Americans who are citizens of this country. Perhaps that isn't the best way for human beings to determine when, why, where and/or how we ought to consider extending these things to one another.
Some Schmo wrote:Ceeboo, do you have the same amount of sympathy for people in prison as you do for everyone else? Murderers, rapists, thieves, and such?
Ceeboo wrote:Some Schmo wrote:Ceeboo, do you have the same amount of sympathy for people in prison as you do for everyone else? Murderers, rapists, thieves, and such?
What a preposterous question!
No, I don't have the same sympathy for murderers and rapists as I do for the free citizens in South Carolina that lost their job due to layoffs.
Ridiculous!
And with that, I am going to remove myself from this thread/discussion as I wanted to add my voice to the mix and I think I have done so.
Peace,
Ceeboo
Some Schmo wrote:As far as Hillary goes, perhaps she didn't say anything because she knew it was a dumb promise to make. I do remember her saying something about funding programs for ex-coal miners and was lambasted for having the audacity to suggest the coal mining industry was dying.
cinepro wrote:That still doesn't make her the rational choice. Since the act of voting has almost no cost other than a small investment of time and effort, it's not much of a stretch to choose between the .001% chance of Trump actually being able to help me keep my job like he said he would, or the candidate who spent 0% of her time and effort speaking about the thing I am most worried about.
They might have been stupid if they were overconfident in Trump's ability to deliver, but just voting for him alone doesn't mean they acted stupidly or irrationally. It's like the choice between a free lottery ticket and nothing. I don't believe in the lottery on principle (and think it's a con), but if someone offered me a free ticket, I would take it.