Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skeptics

The Off-Topic forum for anything non-LDS related, such as sports or politics. Rated PG through PG-13.
_canpakes
_Emeritus
Posts: 8541
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 6:54 am

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _canpakes »

ldsfaqs wrote:
The CCC wrote:Faqless:

To recap the burning of any fuel produces CO2 a known greenhouse gas.
That 97% of all Climate Scientists agree that added CO2 allows for more absorption of Infra-red radiation heating our planet.

by the way SEE https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... er-funding


Your couple of 97% "study's" are absolute lies....
I've proven this over and over again with people who's studied the 97% claims, who have debunked them with the FULL facts and truth.
Yet you people ignore the facts and just believe what you're told by the media and liberals.

As one example of the lying of one of those 97% "studies". This study evaluated many papers of various climate scientists and then categorized them (badly by the way, poor non-scientific methodology done by an activist), this "study" claimed all these climate scientists supported man-made global warming, yet several of the so-called 97% scientists don't in fact believe in man-made global warming, especially in any level of concern, and certainly don't support the usage of their names claiming they support the claim. Yet your lying study claimed they did..... These scientists directly came out condemning the study and the usage of their name in the claim. Yet you liberals keep going on making the lying claim as if it's settled fact.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg that is the lie of "climate change".

faqs, when will you be writing the Exxon-Mobil corporation to tell them that they're wrong?
_MeDotOrg
_Emeritus
Posts: 4761
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _MeDotOrg »

You obviously haven't read the fine print at the bottom of the DNC platform. Once the head of the E.P.A. has been appointed First Minister of the Secular Religion of Ecology, the First Minister will then appoint a Global Warming Tribunal to hear all charges of heresy against the State Religion.

The Global Warming Tribunal will determine the guilt or innocence of those charged. Certain mitigating circumstances will be considered, from past ownership of Birkenstocks and Volvo station wagons to the possession of recycled Whole Foods Shopping bags.

However, the decision of the tribunal is final. The decision is rendered underneath a marble bas relief tableaux of Rachel Carson, Chief Seattle and Lisa Simpson conquering James Inhofe, Sarah Palin and Mr. Burns on the field of legislation.

Those found guilty will have a Red D carved in their forhead, for DENIER.

Those found guilty of a second offence will have their ObamaCare revoked, and will be turned over to the Death Panels.

Let's not talk about platforms, shall we? A political party platform is a little like an online dating profile. What happens after you get to know someone? What is the outcome, the fruits of the relationship? Let's talk about legislation.

If you are running a business, you can do a lot of 'what if' scenarios. What if your main supplier goes belly up? Do you have backup communication strategies in the event of an internet or cellular failure? Forecasting future pitfalls helps quantify some elements of long-term risk.

If you are the Central Intelligence Agency or the Military, you need to look both short term and long term. What are the possible threats to the security of the United States? Their jobs (in part) are to prognosticate. Climate prognostication has been part of intelligence for years. What if the pattern of drought in California is the beginning of a larger, longer problem?

In the 1960s, the Soviet Union began damming most of the water going into to the Aral Sea, which was actually the fourth largest lake in the world.

The image on the left: The Aral Sea 1989. The image on the right: The Aral Sea in 2014. What used to be the Eastern Aral Sea is now called the Aralkum Desert.

Image

There have been a myriad of ecological disasters that have affected the politics of the region. And this is a relatively tiny ecological displacement in one part of the world. The Military and C.I.A. are tasked with looking at Global threats. In the long term interests of the United States it behooves both the C.I.A. and the Military to study what the effects of climate change might be.

Not so fast, however.

The Atlantic wrote:Climate change is on the chopping block.

If Republicans get their way, the CIA and the Defense Department could soon have a lot less cash for climate research. The House GOP budget unveiled on Tuesday calls for cuts to CIA and DOD programs devoted to the study of global warming, despite the fact that the military has identified climate change as a major national security threat and a key priority.

"The Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency, two of the most important agencies in our national security apparatus, currently spend part of their budget studying climate change," the budget states.

The fiscal blueprint lists climate-change funding at DOD and the CIA as "examples of areas where there should be room to cut waste, eliminate redundancies, and end the abuse or misuse of taxpayer dollars."

"There are dozens of programs that are duplicative or waste taxpayer dollars on activities that are not core functions of the federal government. This budget cuts or consolidates these programs and encourages Congress to take proactive steps toward reform," it states.


Translation: Even though you legitimately see climate change as a potential threat, don't you worry your pretty little heads about it. Relax. Stick your head in the sand. It's cool down here. We don't want you investigating the implications of climate change, there's quite enough of that, thank you very much.

The Republicans are intentionally denying the ability of the Defence Department and the Central Intelligence Agency to investigate what both believe to be a potential significant threat to the security of the United States.
"The great problem of any civilization is how to rejuvenate itself without rebarbarization."
- Will Durant
"We've kept more promises than we've even made"
- Donald Trump
"Of what meaning is the world without mind? The question cannot exist."
- Edwin Land
_The CCC
_Emeritus
Posts: 6746
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2015 4:51 am

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _The CCC »

ldsfaqs wrote:
The CCC wrote:Faqless:

To recap the burning of any fuel produces CO2 a known greenhouse gas.
That 97% of all Climate Scientists agree that added CO2 allows for more absorption of Infra-red radiation heating our planet.

by the way SEE https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... er-funding


Your couple of 97% "study's" are absolute lies....
I've proven this over and over again with people who's studied the 97% claims, who have debunked them with the FULL facts and truth.
Yet you people ignore the facts and just believe what you're told by the media and liberals.

As one example of the lying of one of those 97% "studies". This study evaluated many papers of various climate scientists and then categorized them (badly by the way, poor non-scientific methodology done by an activist), this "study" claimed all these climate scientists supported man-made global warming, yet several of the so-called 97% scientists don't in fact believe in man-made global warming, especially in any level of concern, and certainly don't support the usage of their names claiming they support the claim. Yet your lying study claimed they did..... These scientists directly came out condemning the study and the usage of their name in the claim. Yet you liberals keep going on making the lying claim as if it's settled fact.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg that is the lie of "climate change".


Scientific organizations that accept man made Global Climate change.
SEE https://www.opr.ca.gov/s_listoforganizations.php
_ldsfaqs
_Emeritus
Posts: 7953
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 11:41 pm

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _ldsfaqs »

The CCC wrote:Scientific organizations that accept man made Global Climate change.
SEE https://www.opr.California.gov/s_listof ... ations.php


Given that some 95% of scientists are liberals and generally also atheists, that proves "what" exactly?
Nothing.
Those organizations would be led by liberals and full of liberals.
Also, just because an organization says something doesn't necessarily mean everyone in that organization agrees with what they are saying.

Further, liberal environmental wackos have done a lot over the last many years to take over many organizations and government posts.
It's not accident that there is such a promotion of the latest liberal con job.

Further, it's estimated from various study's that some 40% of ALL scientists don't agree with man-made climate change.
No start using your brain.
"Socialism is Rape and Capitalism is consensual sex" - Ben Shapiro
_Res Ipsa
_Emeritus
Posts: 10274
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:37 pm

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _Res Ipsa »

Wikipedia has a summary of these types of studies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_o ... ate_change

Which "various study's" show that "40% of ALL scientists don't agree with man-made climate change?"
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _Jersey Girl »

ldsfaqs wrote:No start using your brain.


You are indeed a heinous miserable “F”.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: Dem Party Platform For Prosecuting Global Warming Skepti

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Obiwan/ldsfaqs wrote:We are not talking about "adult" mutual consent, we are talking about attraction itself.
Further, you are mistaken to think that there is not mutual consent even in child molestation or pedophilia, especially concerning those in the teen years. Most teens are already sexually active by the time they are 13-14, thus choices are already being made, an adult getting in the mix wouldn't technically make a difference if there is the same free, no-forced choices occurring. Of course, SOCIETY places a standard of wrong in that, but that's not the same as what people actually do and think. To give an example, when I was in the Marine Corps, during my apostasy period, I had sex with what I presumed to be a 15 year old prostitute. Of course, she claimed to be 18, but I could tell otherwise. Was that wrong, certainly, and certainly by my own standards today, but it was certainly consensual and non-power based or forced. Of course, her pimp was clearly exerting power, cause we took longer then we apparently were supposed to, thus he wanted to make sure he was getting money, but anyway, all a sad thing.

Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
Post Reply