Abortion.... the greatest evil that is liberalism

[_ldsfaqs]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdcdZ8NRdeY

Must watch this also.... empty seats at Gosnell's trial, yet you all know Jodi Arias.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/gosnell-movie

[_ldsfaqs]

by the way, in the first video pay attention to the facts about Obama starting at about 6:25.
It makes clear the true evil Obama is in his soul.

[_Tarski]

by the way, in the first video pay attention to the facts about Obama starting at about 6:25.
It makes clear the true evil Obama is in his soul.

1. Like all forms of actual murder and bizarre gruesome medical malpractice, this was obviously already illegal and the man was put to trial as he should have been.

2. There have been numerous gruesome cases of medical malpractice of other kinds such as dangerous botched cosmetic surgery done in backrooms resulting in death. But we don't then make all cosmetic surgery illegal. If you are going to argue against all abortion you must argue against the kind that is typical and legal not this monstrosity that no liberal supports at all. In fact, if you are going to argue against all abortion you must argue against even abortions of, say, mentally handicapped rape victims, danger to life of the mother etc. You must also successfully argue that a fetus at any stage of development is not just genetically human, but also a fully conscious person with the same rights as any person. (This turns out to be not so easy if you really confront all the issues at a deeper level). Bringing this bizarre case up is not an appeal to truth or rationality. It is something else entirely. Something despicable.

3. No liberal supports the illegal and gruesome actions of madman Kermit Gosnell and implying that Obama supports the illegal actions taken by this wack job doctor is an egregious and, well, EVIL, form of lying.
So let's add this to your list of lies.

4. The use of this case to try to push legislation to outlaw something else entirely is cynical and deceptive. It would be like trying to outlaw guns completely on the basis of a rare and gruesome mass shooting.
If my logic were like yours I would be calling anyone who opposed the total elimination of guns a pure evil hearted supporter of mass shootings. But my reasoning on the matter is not so hot headed, dishonest or hysterical as yours is in this case.

5. Chances are that there is someone, some goodhearted woman, who you already know well, admire and recognize as a good and giving person who has had an abortion at some point in their lives for reasons you would be unable to comprehend. Hopefully, they will have the wisdom to never confide in a simpleminded, superstitious, self-righteous and judgmental person as you. If that 3-4 week old fetus (no language, no plans and no self awareness) actually housed a little spirit as you like to suppose, it will have returned peacefully to heaven and there wait to soon be born into better circumstances instead of into what the pregnant woman had perhaps wisely judged as impossible and unhealthy circumstances.

[_Kevin Graham]

by the way, in the first video pay attention to the facts about Obama starting at about 6:25.
It makes clear the true evil Obama is in his soul.

Your infatuation with this talk radio moron shows your naïvété more than anything.

It seems like no matter how many times your dumb talking points, flat out lies and evil attacks on the President get refuted by the evidence, you just keep repeating them. It is as if you're immune to facts.

Did Obama vote to deny rights to infant abortion survivors?

[_Kevin Graham]

To me nothing is more evil or hypocritical than proponents of legislation that would force roughly 51% of our citizens to give birth. The same people who would support this would deny them maternity leave. I can hardly think of a more obtrusive violation of one's rights, but this is the evil that is at the heart of Right Wing hypocrisy. Because we all know they don't really give a damn about that fetus the day it is born because they support policies that make it difficult for the poor to survive, pay for health insurance, eat, breathe, etc. It could be born into a poor family and discarded in the streets and they'll suddenly call it a moocher that should have never been born. Just listen to what ajax just said in the other thread about people having babies they can't afford.

[_ldsfaqs]

Nothing in your article debunks what Obama did you moron Kevin G.....
In fact, it claims THEY DON'T KNOW WHY Obama voted how he did at the end of the article.
The entire article is nothing more than a diversion peice.

As the talk show said, Obama could have voted "present" instead of no, yet he was the ONLY ONE to vote no, even among all the Democrats.

So Kevin, as usual, you are the liar.

You further lie in your other rant as usual.....
- We didn't force them to have sex. Thus, they have to live with the consequences of their actions. If they don't want the child, there's adoption etc.
- Utter slimeball liar.... we have NEVER wanted to deny women "maternity leave". Wow.... your bigoted lying brainwashing is complete as a liberal.
- We support SMART policy's for the poor, that teach a man to fish kind and he lives for a lifetime, not the give a man a fish and he eats for a day (save as a TEMPORARY humanitarian moment). Thus, you are nothing more than a bigoted liar as usual Kevin G.

[_Kevin Graham]

Nothing in your article debunks what Obama did you moron Kevin G.....

It debunks what your fellow idiot said he did. Your fellow radio idiot didn't explain why Obama refused to support that bill. There was no need for it at all, and it was designed as a backdoor attempt by anti-abortionist crowd to limit the rights of pregnant women. Obama was smart enough to see through the charade, which was quite impressive for someone so young as a politician.

[_Kevin Graham]

The entire article is nothing more than a diversion peice.

You wouldn't know since you didn't read them. You're partial to radio and youtube videos probably because you can't read period.

as the talk show said, Obama could have voted "present" instead of no, yet he was the ONLY ONE to vote no, even among all the Democrats.

So? HE VOTED NO FOR GOOD REASON.The guy doesn't explain why he voted no. Instead, he just follows the Brietbart type attack rhetoric as you do. He wants people to think Obama likes to kill babies. Idiots.

So Kevin, as usual, you are the liar.

Lied about what? I just showed how you rely on uneducated idiots to form your opinions. All the while judging everyone else as evil liars.

You further lie in your other rant as usual.....
- We didn't force them to have sex. Thus, they have to live with the consequences of their actions. If they don't want the child, there's adoption etc.

So you're saying the consequences of their actions is that they must give birth, no questions asked? What about those who are raped?

- Utter slimeball liar....

Lied about what?

we have NEVER wanted to deny women "maternity leave". Wow.... your bigoted lying brainwashing is complete as a liberal.

Another example of your own stupidity.

[_Brackite]

Must watch this also.... empty seats at Gosnell's trial, yet you all know Jodi Arias.

Yes, we all here know who Jodi Arias is since she was a Mormon.

In fact, it claims THEY DON'T KNOW WHY Obama voted how he did at the end of the article.

But Obama is not running for President again.