Wow, you are stupid as hell Gad....
Do you
really think so?
1. First there is no "law" against children firing guns.
Sure. But is there a law against children firing fully automatic weapons?
Second, if some liberal did an "expose", I would say good.... Because guess what MORON, I and near any conservative gun handlers would NOT believe near ANY 9 year old is trained enough to handle a full auto UZI.
Why? Is an Uzi really that big of a deal? I've watched a skinny little nine-year-old girl fire a .50 caliber, and she did just fine. She had a couple of adults standing close to help her and while it knocked her flat on her little behind, an adult caught the gun on her way down, and nobody was hurt. I imagine she would have done just fine with an uzi. As you are likely aware, there are two components to the kick experienced when firing a gun. The largest component of the kick is muzzle blast; this is the "rocket" effect where hot gases thrust the gun backward. Vented barrels substantially diffuse this. Then, there is Isaac Newton's second law of motion. The gun thrusts backward in proportion to the mass and velocity of the load the gun fires. But the second law is minimal compared to muzzle blast. So a child has a better chance at firing a ultra-high powered combat weapon with a vented barrel than say, a .12 gauge, even with a shoulder pad. A perfectly legal 3-inch magnum in a .12 gauge will end a 9-year-old girl's interest in shooting for good.
So, so much for your ignorant lying..... showing just how ignorant liberals are of their hate group. Third, I believe in Freedom.... I believe a parent has the right to teach their child to use Construction Tools, which also kill and maim people, or climb trees, to fish, or use a gun, or to build bombs if that is their interest as protectors of society.
Er, there is fantastic sig-line material here, but which is it? You just finished expressing your outrage over a "gun handler" letting a nine-year-old fire an uzi. But parents have the right to teach their kids how to make bombs? And use guns, of course? So which is it?
Don't you know, that some of the very BEST people of this world, in whatever they do, are people who were doing those things when they were young?
You are right. The Earnhardt kids could likely have driven through town as safe as anyone at twelve or thirteen years old. But laws are targeted toward average people. It would be really stupid to allow any nine-year-old to get a drivers license just because the most gifted nine-year-old go-kart racers could handle the task.
Whether it's computers, guns, construction, piano, etc. You on the other hand would LIMIT freedom, creativity, and skill.
Wait -- wasn't it YOU who just said that a 9-year-old girl is not fit to fire an uzi? Who is limiting freedom here?
You are someone who's never studied history, to know the best of us all, many who have saved us in wars, men/women who have invented great things, etc., are men and women who gained their knowledge and skills while young.
So why do you have such a problem with a 9-year-old girl firing an uzi then? You really aren't making a lot of sense here, "ldsfaqs".
2. You conveniently forgot that I called the man a complete idiot, and it was NOT conducive of conservative values to have a inexperienced 9 year old handle a full auto UZI.
Wait: How on earth would you know in advance that she isn't one of these gifted children who will develop a great marksmanship skill early in life, and one day, therefore, save many people in combat? Who are you to limit a child's freedom?
AND, my mention of political, was because YOU liberals are the ones who made it political, in your liberal hate and fascism, using it as an example of why we should ban guns, and that conservatives are stupid, that this shows conservative values. So, stop being an idiot. YOU guys made this thread, not me.
Further, man you are an idiot.... as if the two incidents have anything in common. I judge based on actions and words, not on skin color or necessarily political affiliation idiot. The past event you mention was because of the things HE SAID, HIS ACTIONS, and what was happening in relation to guns in his area, that told me he was liberal. ZERO to do with his skin color MORON.
Let me refresh your memory, ldsfag. MeDotOrg's epic thread about a good guy with a gun walking up to a good guy with a gun elicited this response from you. And this, was the very first thing you had to say on the matter:
ldsfaqs wrote:Notice how the man doing the "demanding" and pulling out his gun was an old crazy black man....?[/
Now, ldsfaqs, why are you lying? Keep up your fibs and you might get called as a General Authority my friend. lol.
Further, I said liberals shouldn't be allowed to have guns, because THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT for the rest of us.
No, you said:
No, the point is that it was a crazy likely liberal person who did something crazy.
It's because you think liberals are "crazy".
So, if you don't want guns, don't have any interest or experience with them, then fine, BAN YOURSELVES! Leave the rest of us alone, the people who actually ARE experts in the tool.
I'm sorry, ldsfaqs, the laugh-attack is nearly killing me. You are dividing the world into people who a) don't have any interest and experience in guns and b) "the rust of us" -- the people who are experts with guns?
And as to your "conclusion".... Well, just more stupidity. Did you forget I called the man stupid? I didn't say anything about HIS political affliation moron. He would be stupid if he was conservative or liberal.
I just don't get this. Why was he stupid? This girl could have been a child-prodigy markswoman. You said yourself that the best of the best started at a young age. Why should her progress be stunted?
My POINT, was you all were parading this as an example of guns being bad, and conservatives (gun lovers, which are primarily conservative) as being bad, so hence was my point. Do you think I like Joe Biden cause he's "okay" with "some" kinds of guns? No, I think he's an IDIOT, he's white and apparently is okay with "some" guns.
[/quote]
Actually, this is an example not of guns being bad, but of a certain cross-section of conservative culture that lacks requisite self-reflection.