is seen riding "It's a Small World" ride for hours at Disneyland commanding them to Vote damn it Vote!

http://now.msn.com/mitt-romney-goes-to-disneyland

I liked the first comment the best.



I guess that's what they talk about when they can't talk about Benghazi. MSNBC hates Republicans, yet they can't seem to stop talking about them.

There is nothing to talk about with Benghazi. It is a non issue except in the minds of the deluded. And MSNBC has a lot to do by correcting FOX News's b***s***, which is what it does regularly.

The best thing about MSNBC is that it actually hires pundits who have an education. Compare, for example. Rachel Maddow's education (PhD Oxford) to Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, Shephard Smith, all of whom are college drop outs.

Greta Van Sustren is educated, but she is also a devoted Scientologist. Nuff said.

Not for you there isn't. You don't have much of a case. Hence Rachel Maddow is focusing on dead abortion issues while Hannity is asking the questions CNN will not. I wouldn't want to talk about it if I were an Obama fan either.

Hannity is part of the problem. He isn't asking questions, he is making outrageous, lying accusations, based on nothing more than the marching orders from the higher ups at Fox. Anyone remotely interested in evidence can clearly see the Right Wing hysteria over this issue is really just another failed conspiracy theory. This is what they do best. Make up s*** to scare the hell out of the ignorant.

Mitt Romney looks very happy at being at the most happiest place on earth.

lame and spoken with the spit dribble of someone brainwashed


case in point...because these two stations share viewers???


appeal to authority is a sign of being illogical......so we can counter your argument by saying that though MSNBC has employed at least one educated on-air personalities their viewers are mostly illogical.
(from what i have read, Stalin was very well educated)


so, being educated really is not enough then?....nuff said?
nope...sure Rachel Maddow's PhD thesis "HIV/AIDS and Health Care Reform in British and American Prisons" obviously qualifies her to be an opinion show host...but since she admits her family is very Catholic...nuff said!

Cute, but I'm not the one watching FOX News all day giving credence to discredited conspiracy theories. Everything you have put forth on this issue has been effectively shot down by the facts. All you have left is the lame FOX News talking point that says everyone must be lying since their testimony doesn't support their conspiracy theory.

It isn't an appeal to authority at all, it is simply an anecdote coupled with a rejection of uneducated opinion driven by those hired propaganda whores of Corporate America. You know, the idiots like Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh.

At least one? I can't think of a single one who sports a GED or High School diploma as their badge of academic success. You know, like so many nit wits at FOX who are hired for their ability to fall in line and be "yes men" for Rupert Murdoch. Here are some other examples:

Chris Mathews - BA from Holy Cross with Graduate work in Economics at North Carolina Chapel Hill

Lawrence O'Donnell - BA - Harvard

Melissa Harris-Perry - PhD Duke University - Was a professor at Princeton and Tulane.

Chris Hayes - BA Brown University

Andrea Mitchell - BA University of Pennsylvania

Martin Bashir - Kings College London

Alex WItt - BA USC

Krystal Ball - BA Economics University of Virginia

Joe Scarborough - BA University Alabama, J.D. University Florida

ED Schultz - BA University of Minnesota

The point is FOX is the GOP's indoctrination headquarters, while MSNBC serves to educate and correct those who have been deluded by their b***s***. It should be no surprise that so many of the "pundits" at FOX have no respect for facts or the fact-checkers. They don't understand what actual research looks like and they really don't care how many times they're proven wrong, because they have complete faith in the idiocy of their loyal audience, who they expect to just keep giving them the benefit of the doubt year after year no matter what reality shows them in the end. It is why Dick Morris keeps appearing as a pundit on their shows. It is why FOX viewers keep pumping out their baseless conspiracy theories just to make excuses for why they were wrong about so much for so long. I mean they are the only station who is really pushing this Benghazi b***s***, and they are the only station that was recently discredited after it constantly told the world the polls were rigged and Romney was going to win in a landslide. At some point, rational thinkers have to step back and just admit they've been listening to a bunch of idiots who don't have the faintest clue what they're talking about. I did that a few years ago. The question for you is, how much evidence is it going to take for you to do the same?

Why do I care what this jackass is doing nowadays? He died a horrible political death, just let the man rest in peace.

That's kind of what a social science degree from academia is, "An old liberal telling a young liberal he likes the way he thinks." I don't have much respect for degrees outside of physical and mathematical sciences.

Well, when compared to Glenn Beck I guess that might be true.

But maybe you should read more about Stalin. He received his highest level of formal education at a Christian seminary.

CNN will not ask the questions for a good reason, and one hint: it's not partisan desire to protect the President from scandal. The Foxites have been trying to turn Benghazi into a club to hammer the President with for weeks beyond the point at which it had already turned stupid.

We get it. They're wildly unhappy that a black Democrat is in the White House. Ok. But just making s*** up to try and make him wrong for something is pretty transparent.

Why won't they release the tape of the attack as they watched it?

Why didn't they know it was a terrorist attack and not a spontaneous demonstration? Who brings mortars to a spontaneous demonstration?

If the President knew and claimed it to be a terrorist attack (which I don't believe he did, he was speaking generally about terrorism) why did he go to the UN 2 weeks later and continue to blame the video instead of calling it what it was, a preplanned terrorist attack?

Why didn't he send anyone to help the Americans being killed during the 6 hour seige?

Why didn't they secure the compound any better than they did as the ambassador requested earlier this year? Someone is either lying or guilty of gross incompetence, and not telling the complete truth qualifies as lying (just as we demand of Mormonism.)

90% of the mainstream media are liberals. It's who they are, they can't help but be biased. Liberals would like to go back to the days when there was no news network with a conservative viewpoint. We get it, you hate Fox News, but your post doesn't really answer those questions in a substantive way.



I'm angry because I am soon to have fewer rights to the money I earn because of Obama. I was equally angry when Bill Clinton was elected.

Are Beck and Limbaugh on Fox News? I thought Beck was off TV now, and I didn't know Limbaugh had a TV show (other than his ill-fated show from the early 90s).

I don't know a single republican who is upset that Obama is black. That's a pretty tacky qualifier on your accusation.

I do. And more than one. My next-door neighbor, for instance. Several guys I shoot with at a club I belong to. This bitch Denise Helms, who wants "this n*****" assassinated.

And the person who made this sign. And this crazy bum.

And all of these fools who used the N-word on Twitter to describe Obama and complain about his reelection.

And apparently Rick Santorum. And Tea Party politician Jules Manson.

And I'm sure I could dig up plenty more. But the main point is that I've heard people say this, in person. And I've heard plenty of other people say things about Obama that were dripping with barely-concealed racism.

Don't forget the poster on this board who referred to Obama as "buckwheat".

cinepro, honestly, you are in denial. It's obvious that some republicans hate Obama because he is a black president. That doesn't mean all republicans are racist, but some certainly are.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the ... f-racists/

Right. Republicans are not racist. They just say innane things that appeal to racists.

The Democratic party appeals to Hugo Chavez. Does that mean Democrats are communist?

Ajax, wouldn't it be better to admit that you're just a little racist than to carry on this charade?

I remember your recent post that you and your wife had decided to have white babies to even things out. I think it's great if you two have decided to have children, but your reason for doing so is about as racists a thing as I can think of.

You're really not fooling anyone.