Bottom line, a witness saw what happened, and it verify's Zimmermans statement.
What I've heard (and I haven't heard everything, so you could be right) is that the witness only said Trayvon was getting the upper hand, not that he attacked Zimmerman when he was leaving.
Further, the Police Report also verify's Zimmerman and the Witness's statements according to the evidence, bloody nose, gash on head, grass stains on back, etc.
Wouldn't change my point either way. I therefore suspect you missed it. Try again.
If Zimmerman had his gun out, Trayvon would have been SHOT well before Zimmerman got so much of the hell beat out of him.
Out as in holding it in his hand? Then maybe. I just meant visible in a holster. Anyhow, it wouldn't matter. Trayvon could have felt threatened regardless of whether or not he knew Zimmerman had a gun.
All your "speculation" is lovely, but irrelevant. Zimmerman was attacked, and then he defended himself. It's as simple as that.
And maybe Trayvon was too. I hear that Zimmerman may have tried to detain Trayvon physically, then Trayvon started to get the upper hand while trying to defend himself. Was that actually the case? I don't know, but it is a possibility as is your pet scene where Trayvon was obviously some evil "punk" who "got exactly what he deserved." The point is we don't know for sure what happened.
All your other conspiracy theory's and fantasy's, pre-judgments, etc. are just that.
And yours aren't?
I'm trying to be fair. I'm not trying to paint Zimmerman as some crazy racist. I'm also not trying to paint Trayvon as a "punk." I mean really, I find it ironic that you feel fine passing judgment on Trayvon while chastising anyone who tries to give both people the benefit of the doubt for being bigoted. I suspect, once again, you won't get my point.