Plates question for Dan Vogel

The upper-crust forum for scholarly, polite, and respectful discussions only. Heavily moderated. Rated G.
Post Reply
_joel7
_Emeritus
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2018 2:38 pm

Plates question for Dan Vogel

Post by _joel7 »

Dan, I am reading your book "The Making of a Prophet." I see that Joseph returned to the wagon with Emma on the night he went to get the Gold Plates, but you say he was empty-handed...correct? Then at home he gives the spectacles (covered up) to Lucy, so where did they come from? Also, why didn't Emma get suspicious that he had no plates with him, but later came home with them? Maybe I need to read further.
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Re: Plates question for Dan Vogel

Post by _moksha »

joel7 wrote:Then at home he gives the spectacles (covered up) to Lucy, so where did they come from?

That is a good question. When the story was in the embellishment phase, what made the helpful embellishers think that the Urim and Thummim breastplates were spectacles? Was it wishful thinking that created the desire to turn the seer stone into an object more closely resembling that which they thought could be a valid translational aid? Or was it simply to lend credence to the story via the biblical breastplates (while unfortunately mistaking them as being spectacles)?

It was probably wrong on their part to offer such a fib rather than crediting Joseph's use of his trusty seer stone. Offering such fibs ended up creating and perpetuating the use of apologetics by those formerly known as Mormons. Have pride in your stones.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
_Dr Exiled
_Emeritus
Posts: 3616
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 3:48 am

Re: Plates question for Dan Vogel

Post by _Dr Exiled »

I think it was Samuel Lawrence who forced Joseph Smith to include spectacles in his plates story, according to Dan Vogel. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mmX-H1GBivk where Dan talks about bringing the "plates" home on a video and I believe the book you are reading contains the same information.
"Religion is about providing human community in the guise of solving problems that don’t exist or failing to solve problems that do and seeking to reconcile these contradictions and conceal the failures in bogus explanations otherwise known as theology." - Kishkumen 
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Plates question for Dan Vogel

Post by _LittleNipper »

Read the very first verse of the Book of Mormon and you will get the picture ---- I, Nephi, having been born to goodly parents, therefore I was taught somewhat in all the learning of my father; and having seen many afflictions in the course of my days, nevertheless, having been highly favored of the Lord in all my days: yea, having had a great knowledge of the goodness and the mysteries of God, therefore I made a record of my proceedings in my days.

Meaning: I had good parents and was taught by my dad everything he knew ---- having seen plenty of trouble in my life; however, I was respected by my Lord throughout my life understanding just how good God is and all His secrets; therefore, I kept a journal.
_Dan Vogel
_Emeritus
Posts: 876
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:26 am

Re: Plates question for Dan Vogel

Post by _Dan Vogel »

joel7 wrote:Dan, I am reading your book "The Making of a Prophet." I see that Joseph returned to the wagon with Emma on the night he went to get the Gold Plates, but you say he was empty-handed...correct? Then at home he gives the spectacles (covered up) to Lucy, so where did they come from? Also, why didn't Emma get suspicious that he had no plates with him, but later came home with them? Maybe I need to read further.


I don’t see this as a problem at all. If Lucy’s account is accurate, Joseph Smith made the spectacles too from a rod bent into a figure 8 and two stones, as I explained. She was only allowed to feel them through the cloth, as the story is told.

Why would Emma get suspicious? How do you know she didn’t? Both believers and non-believers have to deal with Joseph Smith not bringing the plates home in the morning. Why didn’t they question the need to have the plates covered? People do not always act rational or skeptical when they need to be. They trusted whatever Joseph Smith told them.
I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not.
Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)
_LittleNipper
_Emeritus
Posts: 4518
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:49 pm

Re: Plates question for Dan Vogel

Post by _LittleNipper »

Dan Vogel wrote:
joel7 wrote:Dan, I am reading your book "The Making of a Prophet." I see that Joseph returned to the wagon with Emma on the night he went to get the Gold Plates, but you say he was empty-handed...correct? Then at home he gives the spectacles (covered up) to Lucy, so where did they come from? Also, why didn't Emma get suspicious that he had no plates with him, but later came home with them? Maybe I need to read further.


I don’t see this as a problem at all. If Lucy’s account is accurate, Joseph Smith made the spectacles too from a rod bent into a figure 8 and two stones, as I explained. She was only allowed to feel them through the cloth, as the story is told.

Why would Emma get suspicious? How do you know she didn’t? Both believers and non-believers have to deal with Joseph Smith not bringing the plates home in the morning. Why didn’t they question the need to have the plates covered? People do not always act rational or skeptical when they need to be. They trusted whatever Joseph Smith told them.


I imagine that Joseph Smith's friends/relatives figured that they had everything to gain and nothing to lose.
Post Reply