BOMGeo's theories refuted at length and in great detail

[_bomgeography]

When you guys find a genetic link in Asia or Siberia let me know. We can submit it together to various genetic research scientist

[_bomgeography]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)#/media/File%3AHaplogroup_X_(mtDNA).PNG

[_tapirrider]

The closest genetic link outside of America is x2a'j fact end of story.

Stop misrepresenting that link. It is a fact that American Indian x2a DID NOT descend from x2a'j. You cannot end the story on your falsehood.

[_bomgeography]

Well you were not able to find a closer genetic link than x2a'j.

That's ok

"We surveyed our Old World haplogroup X mtDNAs for the five diagnostic X2a mutations (table 2) and found a match only for the transition at np 12397 in a single X2* sequence from Iran. In a parsimony tree, this Iranian mtDNA would share a common ancestor with the Native American clade "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_X_(mtDNA)

[_tapirrider]

You can search in Asia Siberia all you want buts in Iran with the most diversity found in Israel. They can even pinpoint the city.

It isn't even an established fact that x2a'j is found in Iran. It is a possibility, that is all. The evidence right now is far too limited for you to make the claims that you do. And you are misrepresenting what science indicates about that ancestral tie. X2a DID NOT descend from x2a'j. Both descended from a common ancestor that was neither x2a nor x2a'j. Just because it is the closest link, it is still not as close as you claim. Certainly not ancestral to x2a. If you are going to play with science you better have it right, especially when you quote from sources that are saying something different from your claims.

[_Maksutov]

You can search in Asia Siberia all you want buts in Iran with the most diversity found in Israel. They can even pinpoint the city.

It isn't even an established fact that x2a'j is found in Iran. It is a possibility, that is all. The evidence right now is far too limited for you to make the claims that you do. And you are misrepresenting what science indicates about that ancestral tie. X2a DID NOT descend from x2a'j. Both descended from a common ancestor that was neither x2a nor x2a'j. Just because it is the closest link, it is still not as close as you claim. Certainly not ancestral to x2a. If you are going to play with science you better have it right, especially when you quote from sources that are saying something different from your claims.

If McKane had something, you can bet that more than Meldrum, May and their Nazi friend would be pushing it; the church would be proclaiming it from the rooftops. But they don't. Apparently their powers of discernment do not confirm the revelations from the 3 "M"s and their little fascist sidekick. Lo siento mucho.

[_tapirrider]

Well you were not able to find a closer genetic link than x2a'j.

There is no need to find a closer link. X2a'j is not evidence of a Near Eastern migration to the Americas during Biblical times. X2a developed through mutation within North America while x2a'j was doing the same in the Near East.

[_bomgeography]

Well you were not able to find a closer genetic link than x2a'j.

There is no need to find a closer link. X2a'j is not evidence of a Near Eastern migration to the Americas during Biblical times. X2a developed through mutation within North America while x2a'j was doing the same in the Near East.

If you wanted to prove that X migrated through Asia then yes you need to find evidence for it.

You got the same problem that the Book of Mormon meso American apologist have no evidence. That's unfortunate.

[_tapirrider]

Well you were not able to find a closer genetic link than x2a'j.

There is no need to find a closer link. X2a'j is not evidence of a Near Eastern migration to the Americas during Biblical times. X2a developed through mutation within North America while x2a'j was doing the same in the Near East.

If you wanted to prove that X migrated through Asia then yes you need to find evidence for it.

You got the same problem that the Book of Mormon meso American apologist have no evidence. That's unfortunate.

No, direct evidence of haplogroup x in Beringia or Siberia or Asia with ancient human remains is not necessary. All other factors of scientific evidence from mutation rates to x2a in the Americas to the dating of Kennwick man and the established evidence of his x2a provide for the conclusion and consensus of science. There is far more indirect evidence to establish the scientific migration model than anything you have to back up your fantastical claims. And even then, you still misrepresent what the scientific evidence actually says. Are you ready to admit that x2a DID NOT descend from x2a'j?