Tator/Pokatator ~ I'm glad that you liked the thread. I didn't agree with the polemics and harsh name-calling that you employed in your "Vulgar Scatologist" thread, and you did err and attribute a few quotes to William that he never said. There were also several quotes which I thought were mostly innocuous when viewed in their context or quotes that were partially misquoted. Nevertheless, you were the first person to put some serious effort into a thread documenting William's poor behavior, and as someone who had only lurked on this forum off-and-on since its inception, your thread was a learning experience for me. Thank you for that.
William ~ Responding to your posts in different places, you said:
Will Schryver wrote:For the record, I have only posted here under the handles "William Schryver" and "Will Schryver".
Are you sure about that? If so, whoever registered and posted that single post as "
WilliamSchryver" did the best impersonation of you that I've ever seen.
Will Schryver wrote:The time and effort you have obviously expended in assembling this next stage in the GSTP anti-Schryver propaganda campaign is quite impressive
There isn't one shred of "propaganda" in my posts, and I'm disappointed that this is the extent of your level of engagement with my thread. I made significant efforts to make sure that your words could be viewed in their original context in an effort to be fair to you.
Will Schryver wrote:I wish you as much success in achieving your objectives as those who have gone before you.
I'm pretty sure my objectives are the same as yours. You want the "poetry" that you've posted here at MDB to receive the widest exposure possible. So do I. If anything you should be thanking me.
Will Schryver wrote:This is a shameless and baseless LIE.
Your claim is noted. Here are the facts:
(1) Your post was moderated by
harmony as soon as she saw it and you were put on suspension warning. This means that, whatever you said, it was likely more offensive than all of the other material I've compiled in this thread, including your multiple incidents of calling female participants and female Mormon leaders "bitch."
(2)
harmony has testified that you called her a "c***."
(3)
MrStakhanovite has testified that you called
harmony a "c***," and his post in the thread at the time seems to reflect that you said something incredibly harsh
(4) You deny it.
(5) You've been proven to have a poor memory when it comes to your misbehavior towards women.
I'll let those who read this thread decide for themselves.
Commenting on the same incident,
Kevin Graham said:
Kevin Graham wrote:There is simply no reason for MsJack to lie about this.
It's impossible for
me to "lie" about this. I did not personally witness it and am only reporting the testimony of others.
They could be lying about this, but I can't be.
Will Schryver wrote:And you, my dear, are a base propagandist
"My dear?" Have you ever listened to yourself? William, grown men don't call grown women who aren't their wives, nieces or daughters "my dear." I'm pretty sure no one has called me "my dear" since I quit playing on that NWN persistent world RP server.
Wait . . . you don't moonlight as a Lawful Evil Monk-Sorcerer Elf named "Tinto" by any chance, do you?
Will Schryver wrote:However, don't expect it to have the result you most desire: the neutralization of my present and future contributions to LDS apologetics.
Wrong. The result I desire is the neutralization of your brazen misogyny. If you can manage that, you and I will be five by five.
Will Schryver wrote:However, now having so closely associated yourself with the brazen and frantic efforts of people like Kevin Graham and "Kishkumen," you will have at least removed, from the minds of those you aspire to influence, all doubt about your allegiances and motivations. That serves my purposes quite well ...
[SNIP]
That said, I must admit I was somewhat perplexed by the fact that it was MsJack who volunteered to take up the torch (and pitchfork) and thereby taint forevermore her treasured (though illusory, as DCP discovered not long ago) reputation for “objectivity.”
Oh really?
Let's try a little experiment then, William: send the link to this thread to your "
lovely and eminently capable" friend Shirley Ricks.
Ask her if it means she'll be wanting me to return the George Foreman Grill that she and Stephen gave to me at my wedding. Let me know how that goes.
Oh, and tell her that if she's been missing
Buffy since the show ended, the Season Eight comic book series was actually quite good.
----
Doctor CamNC4Me ~ Your apology to
Jersey Girl was classy. Thank you for that.
Droopy ~
Let me here level a shameless attack on the baseless attacks of MsJack You're already off-track, Droopy. My critique was entirely base-ful---it had its "basis" in the misogynist material that I cited in my OP. Please consult the large number of citations that comprise my OP and try again. Feel free to parse any one of those citations and explain to us how they weren't really misogynist.
Wade ~
Nothing encourages respectful treatment of others like a lynch mob full of hypocrits. Feel free to substantively engage the questions I posed in my OP at your leisure, Wade.
Simon Belmont ~ Yes, we all go too far and say things that we later regret from time to time.
However, upon later being confronted with those things, most of us are able to admit that we let the heat of the moment get the best of us and apologize. Most of us do not boldly insist that we did nothing wrong, time and time again.
Had William
ever indicated that his words were poorly chosen and apologized to the women he mistreated, this thread wouldn't exist. Instead he has repeatedly insisted that there isn't anything wrong with treating women this way (except for his promise of a pending apology for calling Emma Smith a "champion bitch").
If you want to document the not-misogynist things he has said, you go right ahead.