It is currently Sat Nov 17, 2018 9:05 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:09 pm 
God

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:57 am
Posts: 2390
-


Last edited by Hasa Diga Eebowai on Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:09 pm 
Teacher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 275
Kishkumen wrote:
stemelbow wrote:
He didn't insinuate that at all. They, meaning his unnamed friend and he, observe that you seem to agree every wit with Scratch - ideologically and temperamentally. Its more a commentary and how much of a disciple you do come off as. I see what they are saying. There is a likeness in both categories between you and Scratch and his pants.


Daniel Peterson wrote:
I gave an example of how one particularly obsessive and hostile critic of mine, who is both clever and, in my judgment, at least somewhat mentally and/or emotionally disturbed, twisted and misrepresented a post here in order to malign me (yet again).

He's in his seventh year of this, and is still going strong. (He is the impresario, for instance, along with his most vocal disciple, of the current nonsense about the supposed "hit piece." In fact, a friend and close observer plausibly suggests, he may actually be the "disciple's" sock puppet, so ideologically and temperamentally joined at the hip are they.) Here's another neat specimen, again relating to something posted on this very blog:


So, Scratch is mentally disturbed, and I am Scratch's sock puppet. Yeah, he wasn't insinuating anything about me being mentally disturbed. Boy, you're dumb as a post, stem.

fwiw, I think he was saying that Scratch is your sock puppet. But I agree 100% that the suggestion that you're mentally disturbed is defamatory.

_________________
"I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not."
Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:10 pm 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 19192
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
Carton wrote:
I agree that suggesting you have a personality disorder is offensive.


I agree, and that is the cause for my complaint.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:10 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Molok wrote:
No, no, no, you r*****. When they "observed that you seem to agree wit with Scratch" That was being used as evidence for him being Scratch's sock puppet. What's it like to be so stupid? Do they put a cork on your fork?


Thanks for the loving reply. You misunderstood him. He used the observation by his friend to suggest they are very close ideologically and temperamentally. His friend's explanation of them perhaps being the same was they were alike--ideologically and temperamentally. That was not DCP's observation. he was being a little too clever for you, and Kish...so you're in good company.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:12 pm 
God

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:52 am
Posts: 7306
I think it would be interesting to hear Everybody Wang Chung's comments on why DCP's online persona seems at odds (a caricature if you will) with his real life persona.

_________________
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:13 pm 
Teacher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 275
Kishkumen wrote:
Carton wrote:
No offense intended Professor Kishkumen, but I have to confess that I also thought that you and Doctor Scratch were the same person. I thought it was kind of an open joke, what with the same kind of "devilish" connotations to the names :twisted: and the fact that you both seem to be the leaders of the anti-mopologetics movement. You're both equally eloquent and I love reading your posts. I love how you are so relentless in your efforts to expose Mopologetics for the malignant growth it has become.

Keep up the good work! You make coming here very enjoyable.


Sure, Carton. You just arrived, so, you don't really have much of a basis for judging. I think that falls under the "being informed" qualification for knowing. If you are informed, and still believe it, then you are probably stupid or just being an ass.

But in your case it is just that you are a more recent arrival.

Well, I do apologize if I said anything to offend you. I sure didn't mean to, and I do think you should be flattered to be compared to Scratch. The two of you are very strong reasons that I like participating here. The overall intelligence and education level of this board is so much higher than over at MDD, and you and Scratch really add to that.

_________________
"I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not."
Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:13 pm 
God

Joined: Tue May 24, 2011 2:57 am
Posts: 2390
-


Last edited by Hasa Diga Eebowai on Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:13 pm 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 19192
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
stemelbow wrote:
Thanks for the loving reply. You misunderstood him. He used the observation by his friend to suggest they are very close ideologically and temperamentally. His friend's explanation of them perhaps being the same was they were alike--ideologically and temperamentally. That was not DCP's observation. he was being a little too clever for you, and Kish...so you're in good company.


No, you are dishonestly misrepresenting what DCP said. That's what is going on here stem. You are spreading your little lies in multiple threads for the sake of causing a diversion.

We get it.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:14 pm 
Teacher
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 275
Drifting wrote:
I think it would be interesting to hear Everybody Wang Chung's comments on why DCP's online persona seems at odds (a caricature if you will) with his real life persona.

Yes, I am really looking forward to Everybody Wang Chung's report! I was hoping he could really dish some dirt on DCP. :twisted:

_________________
"I do not want you to think that I am very righteous, for I am not."
Joseph Smith (History of the Church 5:401)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:15 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Kishkumen wrote:
So, Scratch is mentally disturbed, and I am Scratch's sock puppet. Yeah, he wasn't insinuating anything about me being mentally disturbed. Boy, you're dumb as a post, stem.


You've garbled it a bit. I don't think its near as bad as you have it. His observation is Scratch is perhaps mentally disturbed. His friend thought it possible he was your sock puppet. I don't think he intended to accuse you of mental disturbance. Although it is true, you do seem quite on par with him ideologically and temperamentally.

I do say, you could be reading between the lines a bit and he might have meant something so offensive, but it doesn't seem to be the case reading it and not trying to read into it.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:15 pm 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 19192
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
Hasa Diga Eebowai wrote:
I've suspected that Stem could be a DCP sock puppet for sometime. It is very convenient that he appears just as the John Dehlin affair flared up, after disappearing for so long.

Thanks,

Hasa Diga Eebowai


He's clearly the sock puppet of someone we know. And I think it is pretty clear that damage control and misdirection is the name of the game. He is here to waste time, lie, and annoy people to death.

The Church of Scientology probably has a manual for going this kind of stuff that they passed along to the More Good Foundation.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:16 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Hasa Diga Eebowai wrote:
I've suspected that Stem could be a DCP sock puppet for sometime. It is very convenient that he appears just as the John Dehlin affair flared up, after disappearing for so long.

Thanks,

Hasa Diga Eebowai


+1. You guys want to hit him below the belt promote this view. It'll pretty much ruin his career and life.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:17 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 1814
stemelbow wrote:
Thanks for the loving reply. You misunderstood him. He used the observation by his friend to suggest they are very close ideologically and temperamentally. His friend's explanation of them perhaps being the same was they were alike--ideologically and temperamentally. That was not DCP's observation. he was being a little too clever for you, and Kish...so you're in good company.

Oh I have reading comprehension problems? Jesus Christ. Projection much?

_________________
Brand New - Degausser (live)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:18 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Besides we all have some sort of mental disturbance, right? or is it just me?

I thought that's why we posted here.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:20 pm 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 19192
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
stemelbow wrote:
You've garbled it a bit. I don't think its near as bad as you have it. His observation is Scratch is perhaps mentally disturbed. His friend thought it possible he was your sock puppet. I don't think he intended to accuse you of mental disturbance. Although it is true, you do seem quite on par with him ideologically and temperamentally.

I do say, you could be reading between the lines a bit and he might have meant something so offensive, but it doesn't seem to be the case reading it and not trying to read into it.


Wow, stem.

See, this is what I mean. You are very good. I respect this part of you. Much better than a lot of the other crap you post.

You know as well as I do that the name of the game in insinuations is direction of others to draw a certain conclusion. The person who insinuates need not make any positive claim. What he does is paint a picture that prompts others to fill in the blanks in the way he wants.

So, first he says that Scratch is perhaps mentally disturbed.

Then he says that his friend "plausibly suggests" that one (Kish/Scratch) is the sock puppet of the other.

All the while, he knows for a fact that I and Scratch are not the same person.

Artfully, he never says that.

It is pretty damn clear that he wants others to view me as mentally disturbed. You know that too, but you are all about wiping his ass so it doesn't stink in front of strangers.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:24 pm 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 19192
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
Molok wrote:
Oh I have reading comprehension problems? Jesus Christ. Projection much?


Don't sweat it, Molok. All of this stemelbow stupidity is an act designed to annoy us.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:29 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Kishkumen wrote:
It is pretty damn clear that he wants others to view me as mentally disturbed. You know that too, but you are all about wiping his ass so it doesn't stink in front of strangers.


Gross. I'm disgusted by your imagination!

Anywho, don't fret I won't view you as mentally disturbed even though the lot of your partners view me that way.

oh i'm so offended

Oh yeah, there was some efforts not long ago accusing me of being autistic by some of your partners here. That was sweet. When I protested another of your partners started a thread about how bad I am (something about the lowest of the low) that I would object to the hostility shown towards those with autism.

Those were the days. Oh wait, these are pretty much the same days.

Well, I wish an apology from me meant something. I'm sorry. No one need think you mentally disturbed.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:29 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 10:31 pm
Posts: 1814
Kishkumen wrote:
Molok wrote:
Oh I have reading comprehension problems? Jesus Christ. Projection much?


Don't sweat it, Molok. All of this stemelbow stupidity is an act designed to annoy us.

I know Kish. I don't post very often but I read this forum pretty much every day. It gets very annoying reading page after page of Stem doing his best to turn every topic into a discussion about him.

_________________
Brand New - Degausser (live)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:30 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Kishkumen wrote:
Don't sweat it, Molok. All of this stemelbow stupidity is an act designed to annoy us.


Not true. I object. I'm actually this stupid. The annoyance extends to all those who know me.

See ya.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:31 pm 
God

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:40 pm
Posts: 5872
Molok wrote:
I know Kish. I don't post very often but I read this forum pretty much every day. It gets very annoying reading page after page of Stem doing his best to turn every topic into a discussion about him.


Think of it this way, without me, folks like Kish wouldn't know you existed. There's always a positive in all this. Stop pouting, for crying aloud.

_________________
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Daniel Peterson's Latest Attack on Kishkumen
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:32 pm 
God

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:52 am
Posts: 7306
stemelbow wrote:
I'm actually this stupid.


Agree

_________________
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group