A grudge against William Schryver for some comments he made toward some women on this board.
Speaking of which, let me hereby reiterate the comments I made towards the two allegedly female posters on this board (I emphasize "allegedly" because, seeing as how they both post anonymously, we therefore have no way of verifying their gender).
Those of us who have either long used our real names, or in using monikers, have actually had our real names and locations present in the Profile section of the message board, have long ago learned the danger of making our real identity known. I wouldn't do it any other way, but the character smears I've had to endure here because of it (at least a couple of them having been likely actionable) militate against giving much of a personal nature away to the Morlocks.
I think it was Bob Crockett who years ago at the FAIR mentioned to me that he believed Scratch was, in actuality, a female. I'm nor really sure that any of these people are really what they seem.
In my ever-so-humble opinion, the MDB posters who go by the names "beastlie" and "dissonance" (or some variations thereof), are two of the most loathsome specimens of womanhood I have ever encountered in my half-century of life upon this planet.
With which I am in perfect agreement.
Of course, my opinion of these two females (or shemales, as the case may be) is shared by many, and therefore I speak also in behalf of several others whose association with the two creatures in question has produced sentiments similar to my own.
Well, mine goes back into the early 2000nds, to the old ZLMB days of rage. Little has changed.
In any case, should the allegedly offended [deleted]
CamNC4Me be so motivated by his indignation, I welcome him to be in attendance at the inevitable public debate between me and Mark Hofmann's old trusty sidekick, Brent Metcalfe. After the debate, we can repair to the parking lot where the "noble defender of the defenseless" may "hit me with his best shot" and then pray it was sufficient to render me incapable of reciprocation. Bear in mind that I am a devout adherent to the Ronald Speirs
philosophy of combat. I take no prisoners. Hence the invitation for my putative opponent to attempt to deliver the first blow and thus provide me with an air-tight claim of self-defense.
The only thing about either a duel or a all-out free-for-all is that I don't believe in fighting fair. CAM can have the 18th century pistols. For me:
CAM would literally not exist
after a run-in with old Betsy here, but as the M-134 has to be mounted on fixed-wing aircraft or a terrestrial vehicle of some kind, I wouldn't even have to step out on the pavement to get the job done.
Now that's my kind of duel!
I must confess that I find it fascinating that this is now the third member of The Great and Spacious Trailer Park (lostindc and Cracker Graham being the others) to threaten me with bodily harm whilst laboring under the perpetual state of humiliation consequent to engaging me in purely rhetorical contests.
That's what happens when these folks lose argument after argument after argument and then fly into a rage and break their bong. Its kind of an anger management issue, I think.
Now, should Graham desire to "have a crack at me," I will consent to having one arm tied behind my back in order to lend some measure of parity to the contest.