It is currently Mon Nov 12, 2018 9:07 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 12:56 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:29 am
Posts: 1060
Location: California
National Academies Hides $500 Billion ‘Immigration Tax’ In 495-Page Report

Officials at a prestigious private D.C.-based think-tank are trying to hide their data showing how immigration is imposing massive costs on wage-earners and on taxpayers.
The think-tank, titled The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, is not a government-run agency. It is a privately run think-tank which writes politically influential reports for government and private-sector funders. For example, the group’s new Sept. 22 immigration study was funded by the pro-immigration John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

The jargon-filled, much-caveated, 495-page report does show the information needed to measure how legal and illegal immigration transfers $500 billion a year from the wages paid to working-Americans towards companies, firms, Wall Street investors and to new immigrants. But the report does not provide a dollar figure for the ‘immigration tax.’

Deep in the report, but not in the press release, it shows how each new unskilled immigrant costs state and local taxpayers $1,600 per year. It shows how the annual cost of legal and illegal immigration to state and local taxpayer is at least $57 billion, and that each unskilled immigrant is a net loss to taxpayers for the next 75 years.

Hundreds of pages inside the report, but not in the summary, it shows that the latest wave of legal and illegal immigrants aren’t integrating to the U.S. economy as fast as prior generations, and sit hows that only university-trained foreign migrants can pay their way in the United States by taking white-collar jobs sought by university-trained Americans.

The group’s hide-the-cost spin was copied by The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal — but the report was mostly ignored by other media outlets amid the turmoil in Charlotte and the 2016 presidential campaign. Also, Breitbart News detailed much of the bad news in the report, one day before it was published on Sept. 22.

The critical details are difficult to find in the long report, but a useful guide has been published by one member of the committee which wrote the report. Prof. George Borjas, a Harvard expert on immigration, posted his easy-to-use guide on his website. The guide says that,


Unfortunately the report does not give a transparent estimate of the size of the wealth transfer from workers to firms, reporting instead that, on average, wages went down by 5.2 percent. It would be better if they had reported the number of dollars involved in that transfer. That number, it turns out, would be about $500 billion.

Cheap immigrant labor creates an “immigration surplus” — but the surplus is only one-tenth the size of the transfer from wage-earners to investors, says the report.


To summarize, in this simple theoretical model of the labor market, the influx of immigrants initially drives down wages but native incomes still rise in the aggregate due to the immigration surplus … the immigration surplus arises because the labor supplied by new immigrants makes native-owned capital more productive. Restating, immigration raises the return to capital, making capital more productive and increasing income to owners of capital … using this methodology, implies that the current stock of immigrants lowered wages by 5.2 percent and generated an immigration surplus of $54.2 billion, representing a 0.31 percent overall increase in income that accrues to the native population.

The report, says Robert Rector, an economist at the Heritage Foundation, also shows the only other gain from immigration is “through technology innovation generated by patents from technically educated immigration.” But, Rector said, few immigrants develop new technology.


The bottom line is that only about a fifth of immigrants coming in have a college degrees, so the overwhelming bulk of the immigration doesn’t have any relationship to technology change. So, by and large, they’re basically saying [in the report] that the bulk of immigration does not have positive effects.

Advocates of immigration, including the directors of the new study, are obscuring those aspects of the study by hiding the costs in vague languages, and by touting other aspects — that more immigrants increases the overall size of the economy or that wage-losses by some Americans are offset by the gains to other Americans who hire cheaper labor.

“To the extent that negative impacts occur, they are most likely to be found for prior immigrants or native-born workers who have not completed high school—who are often the closest substitutes for immigrant workers with low skills,” said a statement from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine.

That vague and conditional sentence skirts a main conclusion that immigration cuts working Americans’ wages by roughly 5.2 percent per year, or a total of $500 billion per year. That $500 billion ‘immigration tax’ is scooped up by new low-wage immigrants and by the owners of companies which employ the new immigrants.

The committee’s leader added her pro-immigration spin to the press statement. “The panel’s comprehensive examination revealed many important benefits of immigration — including on economic growth, innovation, and entrepreneurship — with little to no negative effects on the overall wages or employment of native-born workers in the long term,” claimed Francine Blau, a professor at Cornell University. She did not describe the scale of the immigration tax or immigration’s impact on higher-skilled Americans.

When considering the costs to taxpayers, she hid her report’s data in more vague language. The “fiscal picture is more mixed, with negative effects especially evident at the state level when the costs of educating the children of immigrants are included,” she said.

But the study stretched out its economic forecast to three-quarters of a century, or 75 years, so that it could show some partial economic gains from low-skilled immigrants. “Projected over a future time horizon of 75 years, this analysis found that the fiscal impacts of immigrants are generally positive at the federal level and generally negative at the state and local level,” the statement said.

Deep in the report, it says that state and local taxpayers lose at least $57 billion per year hosting the current wave of legal and illegal immigrants, because the migrants can’t earn enough money or pay enough taxes to fund the various benefits they and their children get from American taxpayers.

The group’s spin was accepted by The Wall Street Journal, which reported that;


“Immigration has little effect on the wages or employment levels of native-born Americans over the long haul and is a net benefit for long-term economic growth, according to one of the most comprehensive studies on the flow of workers into the U.S. … The conclusion runs counter to a popular narrative suggesting immigrants take the jobs of U.S. citizens, though it does acknowledge some narrow costs. For example, the study highlights research showing that an influx of lower-skilled workers can lead to lower wages for earlier waves of immigrants and native-born high-school dropouts.

The New York Times also put a happy face on the report by printing the press statement’s description;


Do immigrants take jobs from Americans and lower their wages by working for less?

The answer, according to a report published on Wednesday by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, is no, immigrants do not take American jobs — but with some caveats…

• “We found little to no negative effects on overall wages and employment of native-born workers in the longer term,” said Francine D. Blau, an economics professor at Cornell University who led the group that produced the … report.

The Times’ headline — “Immigrants Aren’t Taking Americans’ Jobs, New Study Finds” — is a diversion partly because the study’s main result was to show that Americans pay a huge cost for immigration via wage-cuts and increased tax expenditures, not via job losses.

Outside immigration experts, such as Jason Richwine, for example, quickly summarized the government-spending side of the huge report.


In all eight of the NAS’s [economic] scenarios, immigrants without a high school degree have a negative long-term impact [on government budgets]. Immigrants with only a high school degree have a negative impact in seven out of eight scenarios. College graduates, by contrast, have positive impacts across the board. So despite the varying assumptions and wide-ranging findings, the NAS’s long-term fiscal analysis does have a consensus take-away: Low-skill immigration results in a net cost for taxpayers, while high-skill immigration produces a net gain. That’s a lot of work for a not-too-surprising finding.

Also, The Washington Times reported


Immigration drains the government, sapping as much as $296 billion a year from federal, state and local taxpayers while depressing wages, at least in the short run, according to an authoritative study released Wednesday by the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine.

Breitbart News has also shown how immigration slams white-collar workers.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ration-tax

Hopefully Hillary can keep this data hidden from working Americans lest Trump were to win and I were to lose my most important voting bloc.

_________________
“There were mothers who took this [Rodney King LA riots] as an opportunity to take some milk, to take some bread, to take some shoes ... They are not crooks.”

This liberal would be about socializing … uh, umm. … Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:00 pm 
God

Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:44 pm
Posts: 11637
Back to sucking the teet of Brietbart again, I see.

Are you hoping people would actually read your stupid ____ the second time around using a different name?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:09 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:59 am
Posts: 13384
LOL... so you finally decided you don't care that everyone knows you're ajax, huh? Good for you, ya racist piece of ____.

_________________
"You get to have your own beliefs, and your own wishes, and dreams, and imaginations. What you don't get to have is your own reality." - Sethbag

"Good thing your safe space isn't being violated with the horrors of self-awareness." - Dmetri Cromwell (some guy on Facebook)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 1:20 pm 
God

Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:51 pm
Posts: 6746
Like you, your hero Jason Richwine is a known racist bigot.
SEE https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ion-racism


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 2:24 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 5:37 pm
Posts: 7562
Location: On walkabout
Looks like Ajax is taking lessons from faqs on plagiarism. The bulk of the post is a copy and paste from this Breitbart article. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ation-tax/

_________________
​“The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced Nazi or the dedicated communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction, true and false, no longer exists.”

― Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:36 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:29 am
Posts: 1060
Location: California
Anyone who doesn't want to pay an extra $1600/year in tax for unlimited immigration is a racist. We'll shame their tax dollars and votes out of them, while posting misleading statistics that say open borders is great for native wage earners, while the business owners of the 1% continue to get richer courtesy of the middle class taxpayer.

_________________
“There were mothers who took this [Rodney King LA riots] as an opportunity to take some milk, to take some bread, to take some shoes ... They are not crooks.”

This liberal would be about socializing … uh, umm. … Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:47 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am
Posts: 17196
Maxine Waters wrote:
Anyone who doesn't want to pay an extra $1600/year in tax for unlimited immigration is a racist. We'll shame their tax dollars and votes out of them, while posting misleading statistics that say open borders is great for native wage earners, while the business owners of the 1% continue to get richer courtesy of the middle class taxpayer.


When are you going to start bashing Jews? I think that's next if I'm not mistaken.

- Doc


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:59 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:29 am
Posts: 1060
Location: California
Quote:
When are you going to start bashing Jews? I think that's next if I'm not mistaken.

- Doc


You're exaggerating like everyone else. Perhaps this doesn't matter to you since you're not competing in the job market, but protecting your standard of living is far from racist.

_________________
“There were mothers who took this [Rodney King LA riots] as an opportunity to take some milk, to take some bread, to take some shoes ... They are not crooks.”

This liberal would be about socializing … uh, umm. … Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 4:11 pm 
God

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:39 am
Posts: 14673
Maxine Waters wrote:
Quote:
When are you going to start bashing Jews? I think that's next if I'm not mistaken.

- Doc


You're exaggerating like everyone else. Perhaps this doesn't matter to you since you're not competing in the job market, but protecting your standard of living is far from racist.

What about advocating for a white only society where eugenics is used to maintain racial purity? Is that racist? How about arguing the Nazis didn't go far enough in the attempted genocide of the Roma people? Is that racist?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 5:40 pm 
God

Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:44 pm
Posts: 11637
Maxine Waters wrote:
Quote:
When are you going to start bashing Jews? I think that's next if I'm not mistaken.

- Doc


You're exaggerating like everyone else. Perhaps this doesn't matter to you since you're not competing in the job market, but protecting your standard of living is far from racist.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlQ9KP3DZlI


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:34 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am
Posts: 17196
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/how- ... 34894.html
Quote:
It’s remarkable to sell your company for $900 million. But it only gets sweeter when you find out you’ve become a billionaire in the process.

Div Turakhia, 34, sold his 5-year-old ad-tech company, Media.net, to Beijing-based Miteno Communication Technology last month. The near-billion dollar acquisition is the third-largest in the industry’s history, behind Microsoft’s (MSFT) acquisition of aQuantive for $6 billion in 2007 and Google’s (GOOGL, GOOG) purchase of DoubleClick for $3 billion also in 2007.


It must really chafe Ajax18 to no end to see an immigrant-American who isn't White make it big. I wonder if his billions will benefit our country.... Hrm....

- Doc


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:10 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:29 am
Posts: 1060
Location: California
Quote:
How about arguing the Nazis didn't go far enough in the attempted genocide of the Roma people? Is that racist?


Yes it is, and I apologize to the extent those words have done any damage. That's really not what white nationalism is about. It's not what I'm about either. We believe we should share equal rights with all other races.

_________________
“There were mothers who took this [Rodney King LA riots] as an opportunity to take some milk, to take some bread, to take some shoes ... They are not crooks.”

This liberal would be about socializing … uh, umm. … Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 5:28 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am
Posts: 17196
Maxine Waters wrote:
Quote:
How about arguing the Nazis didn't go far enough in the attempted genocide of the Roma people? Is that racist?


Yes it is, and I apologize to the extent those words have done any damage. That's really not what white nationalism is about. It's not what I'm about either. We believe we should share equal rights with all other races.


No it's not. Stop trying to downplay what the WN movement is about. It's literally the opposite of egalitarianism.

Jesus. One would think you don't know the Internet or Google exists, and that getting fact checked is a foreign concept to you. You've literally created a new fallacy:

No True Racist

- Doc


Last edited by Doctor CamNC4Me on Sat Sep 24, 2016 8:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 6:55 am 
God

Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:39 am
Posts: 14673
Notice that 1) He cut out my mentioning his advocacy of a white only society that maintains racial purity through eugenics. He ain't apologizing for that. and 2) his "apology" carries the non-pology caveat that he apologizes only insofar as his words on a neo-Nazi message board have translated into real damage.

Hey Ajax18, remember when you argued that blacks are biologically predisposed to being morally inferior to whites, perhaps because they do not feel remorse like a normal white person, and this overshadows your belief that the are also biologically predisposed to be intellectually inferior to whites? Is that racist?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: National Academy Hides $500 billion immigration tax
PostPosted: Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:54 am 
God

Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 10:51 pm
Posts: 6746
Maxine Waters wrote:
Quote:
When are you going to start bashing Jews? I think that's next if I'm not mistaken.

- Doc


You're exaggerating like everyone else. Perhaps this doesn't matter to you since you're not competing in the job market, but protecting your standard of living is far from racist.


Careful your Skittles are showing.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group