It is currently Mon May 21, 2018 8:45 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:27 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:28 pm
Posts: 7213
Some Schmo wrote:
Oh, no offense taken at all, bud.


Well, I'm glad I didn't get on your nerves too much.

_________________
“I was hooked from the start,” Snoop Dogg said. “We talked about the purpose of life, played Mousetrap, and ate brownies. The kids thought it was off the hook, for real.”


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:38 pm 
Master Mahan

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 5604
The Nehor wrote:
You can't provide calm, meaningful, well-composed rebuttals of the rantings of a lunatic.


More name-calling.

Quote:
Of all the people in this discussion only one is in a position to know and he said it doesn't happen.


He said *what* doesn't happen? That there has never been a single setting apart in the history of Mopologetics? Unfortunately, Tom provided a timely CFR which completely blows that claim out of the water, Nehor. You *have* actually be reading the posts, right? Because you are making some pretty staggering mistakes here.


Quote:
I can't debate you. If a lunatic points out that the sky is in fact pink with purple dots in it there's no having a conversation. There is pointing, laughing, and possibly throwing peanuts at him.


Your analogy could use some work. For example, if the sky routinely changed every single day--no make that every hour (or practically every hour), and if it also featured different designs, and, if someone were to say, "Gee, you know, it makes sense that the sky might sometimes turn pink, and have purple dots in it," then you might be somewhere within the ballpark of what I've been saying. Instead, you are strongly suggesting that you have serious reading comprehension problems. Nowhere did I ever say, definitively, that the Mopologists absolutely, 100% have been set apart and/or blessed. Instead, I said that it is quite safe to believe that they have. You are unable to correctly comprehend the basic position here, and, further, you are unable to supply anything resembling an intelligent rebuttal, so I suppose it should come as no surprise that your resort to name-calling.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:42 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:05 pm
Posts: 11830
I give up, you're impossible to reason with.

Enjoy your inane pontificating.

_________________
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 7:48 pm 
Master Mahan

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 5604
The Nehor wrote:
I give up, you're impossible to reason with.

Enjoy your inane pontificating.


Of course you give up. You never had a reasonable point to begin with.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 8:29 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:05 pm
Posts: 11830
Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
I give up, you're impossible to reason with.

Enjoy your inane pontificating.


Of course you give up. You never had a reasonable point to begin with.


The pot calls the kettle black.

_________________
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 12:20 am 
Master Mahan

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 5604
The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:

Of course you give up. You never had a reasonable point to begin with.


The pot calls the kettle black.


The Nehor---

Where did I ever accuse you of being a "clown"? Where did I ever claim that you were " impossible to reason with"? I don't think that's the case, incidentally, I just think you're a weak reader, and that you're crippled by insecurity, and thus you rely on "humor" to make yourself seem "cool."


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:48 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:05 pm
Posts: 11830
Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor---

Where did I ever accuse you of being a "clown"? Where did I ever claim that you were " impossible to reason with"? I don't think that's the case, incidentally, I just think you're a weak reader, and that you're crippled by insecurity, and thus you rely on "humor" to make yourself seem "cool."


I was referring only to the statement quoted where you said I had no reasonable point. You don't either, you impossible to reason with, quote overusing, insecure, weak reading, humorless, uncool clown.

There, I think I got everything in your post.

I'm sorry I hurt your widdle feelings by calling you a clown but that's no reason to blow up like this.

_________________
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 12:28 am 
Master Mahan

Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:13 pm
Posts: 5604
The Nehor wrote:
Mister Scratch wrote:
The Nehor---

Where did I ever accuse you of being a "clown"? Where did I ever claim that you were " impossible to reason with"? I don't think that's the case, incidentally, I just think you're a weak reader, and that you're crippled by insecurity, and thus you rely on "humor" to make yourself seem "cool."


I was referring only to the statement quoted where you said I had no reasonable point. You don't either, you impossible to reason with, quote overusing, insecure, weak reading, humorless, uncool clown.


You believe that it's "unreasonable" to assume that people involved in significant, faith-related, apologetic ventures would not receive blessings? And, you'd believe this in light of the fact that ward custodians are set apart?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Nominations for the Hughies
PostPosted: Sun Apr 05, 2009 1:15 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 8:05 pm
Posts: 11830
Mister Scratch wrote:
You believe that it's "unreasonable" to assume that people involved in significant, faith-related, apologetic ventures would not receive blessings? And, you'd believe this in light of the fact that ward custodians are set apart?


Yes, I've been put in charge of a few significant, faith-related ventures and have not received blessings for those ventures. I know others in similar positions. They haven't either. I have the advantage on you in that I actually belong wholeheartedly to the organization you criticize. I am involved. I talk with leaders, many of whom are my friends. I know how things generally work in this organization and I'm telling you that you are bonkers.

_________________
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 93 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exiled, Fence Sitter, Google [Bot] and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group