It is currently Mon Nov 12, 2018 8:37 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:38 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:32 pm
Posts: 6215
Location: in the dog house
SleepingWillow wrote:
Go ahead, ask them if they capriciously ban people who follow the board guidelines, stay civil and reasonable, but disagree with the party line. I put money down that you won't get anything except denial or a sarcastic form of yes. They're very proud of their "free-idea zone."


The problem is that "reasonable" is a subjective term.

_________________
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:09 pm 
Nursery
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:36 pm
Posts: 11
asbestosman wrote:
The problem is that "reasonable" is a subjective term.
If you want to argue that I was unreasonable, whilst Pahoran (or Hammer/selek/etc.), el Capitino Douchebag de Apologeticos, was reasonable, by all means go ahead.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:16 pm 
God

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:35 pm
Posts: 18195
Location: Shady Acres Status: MODERATOR
SleepingWillow wrote:
asbestosman wrote:
The problem is that "reasonable" is a subjective term.
If you want to argue that I was unreasonable, whilst Pahoran (or Hammer/selek/etc.), el Capitino Douchebag de Apologeticos, was reasonable, by all means go ahead.


Apologists are always reasonable. It's the critics who have to await judgment on a case by case basis.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:18 pm 
Elder
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 324
harmony wrote:
SleepingWillow wrote:
asbestosman wrote:
The problem is that "reasonable" is a subjective term.
If you want to argue that I was unreasonable, whilst Pahoran (or Hammer/selek/etc.), el Capitino Douchebag de Apologeticos, was reasonable, by all means go ahead.


Apologists are always reasonable. It's the critics who have to await judgment on a case by case basis.



AHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

Harmony, I love that!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:31 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:32 pm
Posts: 6215
Location: in the dog house
SleepingWillow wrote:
asbestosman wrote:
The problem is that "reasonable" is a subjective term.
If you want to argue that I was unreasonable, whilst Pahoran (or Hammer/selek/etc.), el Capitino Douchebag de Apologeticos, was reasonable, by all means go ahead.


I wish to argue no such thing. I'm only saying that from the mods' point of view, such may be the case (and you're really not helping your case when you resort to namecalling).

_________________
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bret Ripley, Doctor CamNC4Me, Google [Bot], Philo Sofee and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group