It is currently Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:33 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:16 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:26 pm
Posts: 3323
bcspace wrote:
I haven't said in this thread it was or wasn't doctrinal. I'm simply waiting on you guys to use the tools that have been given to determine what is and is not doctrine. So far, that hasn't happened. Unsupported claims have been made though and you need to break that habit if you want any respect.


It is slightly surprising to see you back to proclaiming your expertise on doctrine after the thorough ass-kicking you had recently on this board.

_________________
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:13 am 
Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 348
Location: The Great Expanse of the Magical Net
Bueller...

Bueller...

Bueller...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:08 am 
Elder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 2:53 pm
Posts: 348
Location: The Great Expanse of the Magical Net
Come on, bc. This isn't going away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:15 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 04, 2006 11:48 am
Posts: 18447
Quote:
I love the part where I use bcspace's own methodology, arrive at the correct (if inconvenient) conclusion, then he shows up, yells at Tobin for a second, and disappears without addressing my statement.


You haven't said anything inconvenient. I already had mentioned the doctrine and you incompletely referred to what Hinkley actually said and settled on. I had made no other claim other than the OP make an actual doctrinal reference. There's no hay to make here.

_________________
Machina Sublime
Satan's Plan Deconstructed.
Your Best Resource On Joseph Smith's Polygamy.
Conservatism is the Gospel of Christ and the Plan of Salvation in Action.
The Degeneracy Of Progressivism.
A lesson on 'Faggotry' for Kevin Graham; a legitimately descriptive and even positive term used by homosexuals themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:47 am 
Valiant A
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:33 pm
Posts: 161
I like the KFD, myself. It is one of the more ennobling, humanistic bits of theology you will find in organized religion.

_________________
Hey listen don't you let 'em get your mind...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:50 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 4:02 am
Posts: 5986
Tobin wrote:
I mean man is not God nor ever will be. Our role in the everlastings is not as God and we will never have that role. Sure, we'll assist God in whatever he asks of us, but the false doctrine here is that men will be Gods unto themselves, having trillions of children with their wives, and creating worlds for those spirit children to inhabit. This is a completely false and evil doctrine taught in the Church and is used by the enemies of the Church to belittle the gospel and the truth. It needs to be stamped out because of that.


You should be disfellowshipped. Clearly you haven't served a mission, and taught the principle of Eternal Progression.

- VRDRC

_________________
http://www.cesletter.com

Man is nothing else but that which he makes of himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:00 am 
God

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 3:52 am
Posts: 7306
Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Tobin wrote:
I mean man is not God nor ever will be. Our role in the everlastings is not as God and we will never have that role. Sure, we'll assist God in whatever he asks of us, but the false doctrine here is that men will be Gods unto themselves, having trillions of children with their wives, and creating worlds for those spirit children to inhabit. This is a completely false and evil doctrine taught in the Church and is used by the enemies of the Church to belittle the gospel and the truth. It needs to be stamped out because of that.


You should be disfellowshipped. Clearly you haven't served a mission, and taught the principle of Eternal Progression.

- VRDRC


From the current Gospel Principles manual...

Quote:
Joseph Smith taught: “It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God. … He was once a man like us; … God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 345–46).

_________________
“We look to not only the spiritual but also the temporal, and we believe that a person who is impoverished temporally cannot blossom spiritually.”
Keith McMullin - Counsellor in Presiding Bishopric

"One, two, three...let's go shopping!"
Thomas S Monson - Prophet, Seer, Revelator


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:56 am 
Classless piece of s***
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:11 pm
Posts: 2498
Location: The Orange House, 3rd door on the left.
Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

_________________
"Others cannot endure their own littleness unless they can translate it into meaningfulness on the largest possible level."
~ Ernest Becker
"Whether you think of it as heavenly or as earthly, if you love life immortality is no consolation for death."
~ Simone de Beauvoir


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:03 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:01 am
Posts: 6363
Location: Get ready to feel the THUNDER!
LDSToronto wrote:
Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.
The beatings will continue until their doctrine improves or yours does.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:06 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 8:14 am
Posts: 4078
Location: Somewhere on Interstate 94
Quote:
Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.
Disagreements about their religion among LDS are sad to watch. Just an illustration of the religion's internal inconsistencies.

_________________
Huckelberry said:
I see the order and harmony to be the very image of God which smiles upon us each morning as we awake.

http://www.vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/a ... cc_toc.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:23 pm 
Dark Lord of the Sith
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 5:16 pm
Posts: 12563
Location: A castellated abbey
LDSToronto wrote:
Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.


Evidently God has told all three of them conflicting truths about Mormonism. Maybe this is what He does for entertainment.

_________________
And the life of the ebony clock went out with that of the last of the gay. And the flames of the tripods expired. And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:29 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:26 pm
Posts: 3323
Darth J wrote:
Evidently God has told all three of them conflicting truths about Mormonism. Maybe this is what He does for entertainment.


He must be very bored if he needs entertainment like that.

_________________
"It doesn't seem fair, does it Norm--that I should have so much knowledge when there are people in the world that have to go to bed stupid every night." -- Clifford C. Clavin, USPS

"¡No contaban con mi astucia!" -- El Chapulin Colorado


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:35 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:19 am
Posts: 2471
LDSToronto wrote:
Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

Blindness would explain some of the sentences Droopy types.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arrakis, cognitiveharmony, Craig Paxton, Dr. Shades, Google [Bot], kairos, ludwigm, malkie, sunstoned, Yahoo [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group