Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?

Bob Loblaw · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:26 pm **Posts:** 2203

bcspace wrote:

I haven't said in this thread it was or wasn't doctrinal. I'm simply waiting on you guys to use the tools that have been given to determine what is and is not doctrine. So far, that hasn't happened. Unsupported claims have been made though and you need to break that habit if you want any respect.

It is slightly surprising to see you back to proclaiming your expertise on doctrine after the thorough ass-kicking you had recently on this board.

Samantabhadra · **Posted:** Sat Jun 30, 2012 11:13 am

Bueller...

Bueller...

Bueller...

Samantabhadra · **Posted:** Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:08 am

Come on, bc. This isn't going away.

bcspace · **Joined:** Mon Dec 04, 2006 12:48 pm **Posts:** 14277

Quote:

I love the part where I use bcspace's own methodology, arrive at the correct (if inconvenient) conclusion, then he shows up, yells at Tobin for a second, and disappears without addressing my statement.

You haven't said anything inconvenient. I already had mentioned the doctrine and you incompletely referred to what Hinkley actually said and settled on. I had made no other claim other than the OP make an actual doctrinal reference. There's no hay to make here.

sansfoy · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:33 pm **Posts:** 161

I like the KFD, myself. It is one of the more ennobling, humanistic bits of theology you will find in organized religion.

Doctor CamNC4Me · **Joined:** Mon Jun 15, 2009 5:02 am **Posts:** 4559

Tobin wrote:

I mean man is not God nor ever will be. Our role in the everlastings is not as God and we will never have that role. Sure, we'll assist God in whatever he asks of us, but the false doctrine here is that men will be Gods unto themselves, having trillions of children with their wives, and creating worlds for those spirit children to inhabit. This is a completely false and evil doctrine taught in the Church and is used by the enemies of the Church to belittle the gospel and the truth. It needs to be stamped out because of that.

You should be disfellowshipped. Clearly you haven't served a mission, and taught the principle of Eternal Progression.

- VRDRC

Drifting · **Joined:** Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:52 am **Posts:** 7308

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:

Tobin wrote:

I mean man is not God nor ever will be. Our role in the everlastings is not as God and we will never have that role. Sure, we'll assist God in whatever he asks of us, but the false doctrine here is that men will be Gods unto themselves, having trillions of children with their wives, and creating worlds for those spirit children to inhabit. This is a completely false and evil doctrine taught in the Church and is used by the enemies of the Church to belittle the gospel and the truth. It needs to be stamped out because of that.

You should be disfellowshipped. Clearly you haven't served a mission, and taught the principle of Eternal Progression.

- VRDRC

From the current Gospel Principles manual...

Quote:

Joseph Smith taught: “It is the first principle of the Gospel to know for a certainty the Character of God. … He was once a man like us; … God himself, the Father of us all, dwelt on an earth, the same as Jesus Christ himself did” (Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 345–46).

LDSToronto · **Posted:** Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:56 am

Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

Tobin · **Posted:** Mon Jul 09, 2012 8:03 am

LDSToronto wrote:

Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

The beatings will continue until their doctrine improves or yours does.

MCB · **Posted:** Mon Jul 09, 2012 8:06 am

Quote:

Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

Disagreements about their religion among LDS are sad to watch. Just an illustration of the religion's internal inconsistencies.

Darth J · **Posted:** Mon Jul 09, 2012 2:23 pm

LDSToronto wrote:

Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

Evidently God has told all three of them conflicting truths about Mormonism. Maybe this is what He does for entertainment.

Bob Loblaw · **Joined:** Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:26 pm **Posts:** 2203

Darth J wrote:

Evidently God has told all three of them conflicting truths about Mormonism. Maybe this is what He does for entertainment.

He must be very bored if he needs entertainment like that.

Morley · **Joined:** Mon Apr 25, 2011 12:19 pm **Posts:** 2371

LDSToronto wrote:

Watching tobin, bcspace, and nightlion argue doctrine is like watching three blind people fistfight; entertaining for a few minutes but then just plain sad.

Blindness would explain some of the sentences Droopy types.

Is the King Follet discourse doctrine or not?

Who is online