From Dehlin's thread:
I would hope that apologies would be forthcoming from stem
I'm sorry. I don't know what you have in mind about what wrong doing I did, but I'm quick to apologize generally (ask my wife).
"...on the other thread were engaging in character assassination in an attempt to et the focus off the reprehensible actions of Smith, Midgley, Peterson, and company."
What character assassination are you attempting to foist upon me?
I said I wasn't going to get in a tit-for-tat with you on John's thread, so I won't. I refer you to the first 22 pages of this thread, in which you repeatedly attacked John, said he was making up stories, and questioned his credibility. He has now provided enough information to prove that he was telling the truth about the fact that there was a hit piece authored by Greg Smith that DCP was going to publish, and that GAs intervened to put the kibosh on it. You owe John an apology for saying he was lying about it. The apologists have admitted as much and are now busy tearing John down for his "reprehensible" behavior in "censoring" what appears might have been a defamatory article about him.
You continue to smear him with personal attacks at the MDDB, including this statement:
It seems unfair to blame the pains of loss of faith on people like Daniel Peterson. I think John took a terribly uncharitable, harsh, and mean-spirited turn when he went there.
Why so hostile to John Dehlin, stem? What did he ever do to you? Why so keen on defending DCP, et al. in all of this?