Jules decided to post on this by attacking me. Gee, big surprise there. Derailing are we? All I did was receive an email.
Graham edits emails.
Yes, on occasion. It isn’t usually practical to post entire emails, especially long ones. But I do not do so to hide information. Juliann knows she is just taking advantage of the fact that I am not permitted to speak over there and put her back in her place.
When he did this to me he sent false information to a couple of scholars and that doesn't make them too happy to get caught up in the middle of his games.
What in the hell is she talking about? She had a hissy fit because I said I had a correspondence with Mauss. She then appealed to the mods, who then demanded that I present my private email to them, or else be banned! Mauss turned out to be an extremely nice guy who wasn’t happy being dragged in Juliann’s apologetic agenda. He made that perfectly clear to me that he did not like the way the FAIR types act. I was banned from the forum and the topic died out so I decided not to post all the emails they sent me. Though I did send them to Beastie and I think two or three others who expressed an interest.
Juliann cannot present one single example where I “sent false information” about her, and she knows this. She only gets brave when her opponents aren’t able to put her in her place; no you won’t see here come over here either.
I'm not sure what he gets out of this but it is rather pathetic and it is going to blow up in his face eventually.
I have been doing this kind of primary research – emailing specific scholars and eliciting their opinions first hand - for years. Juliann gets upset with it because it occasionally ends up proving how scholars she uses do not agree with the method and agenda of LDS apologists, including her.
Dissertation committees aren't private, there are no gag orders, no one has been defamed and there are certainly no damages. It costs about $60,000 to get a case through trial and lawyers don't generally take squabbles on contingency. Then Ritner faces the problem that he can't sue the mailman for delivering a letter. The mailman isn't responsible for the contents. Most of all...how would he ever prove his version?
So when Gee contemplates a possible lawsuit against his critics who think him an idiot, well, that’s all fine and dandy right?
It is so ironic that the antis who are so concerned about "truth" are so eager to shut down free speech through the courts.
Shut down free speech? What the hell is she talking about? She (Dunamis) is responsible for shutting down more speeches than the Gestapo.
But what is truly delightful is that Dr. Gee has so upset the countermos by having the audacity to ask for their qualifications that they are resorting to this. Wow...talk about hitting a nerve.
Typical spin by Juliann. She will try to make even the bleakest of situations look like some cause for celebration among apologists.
This is Kevin's game. He did the email ruse on me when the topic got too hot and he needed a way to shut it down.
Astonishing that this is what she has deluded herself into thinking after all these months. The topic died because I was banned before I could post the emails. Hello??
The ONLY reason I decided not to post them later was because I was waiting for more responses, and after a couple weeks when I finally got them, the topic died out and her professor was perhaps the nicest person i have ever met online in my life, and I felt bad dragging him into this, even though it would make Juliann look like more of an idiot! I didn't want to create any awkwardness between the two of them. And this is what I get for having mercy on her, more fabrication and slander.
I think we all know Juliann doesn't have the intellectual capacity to create an environment warm enough to run off a penguin.