It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 7:59 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1610 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:11 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 11:07 pm
Posts: 1056
TAO wrote:
cafe crema wrote:
Isn't helping with what? They way I'm reading this is that the small jokes directed at Will are eroding your belief that this thing and Will's publishing are not related, right?


Yeah, that's about right. And I'd be very disappointed if they were related. You don't do things like this to stop publishment of things.

Alas, I don't think they are related currently.


I don't see why taking jabs at Will should be considered evidence that the two are related. But even if Will was squashed because of what MsJack compiled, it was still only a collection of Will's words. If he lost out publishing due to the compilation it was because of what he said not because someone pointed it out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:22 pm 
θεά
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:06 pm
Posts: 3063
Location: Northbrook, IL
TAO wrote:
PURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR! =^..^=

Nice cat btw! How old is he/she? =D

Four years old. We just adopted him in March. He sometimes refuses to get off the bed when I am making it, so I make it over the top of him.

_________________
My Blogs: ClobberBlog | Προστάτις | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:45 am 
Apostle
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:53 pm
Posts: 797
MsJack wrote:
TAO wrote:
PURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR! =^..^=

Nice cat btw! How old is he/she? =D

Four years old. We just adopted him in March. He sometimes refuses to get off the bed when I am making it, so I make it over the top of him.


Lol. Does he just sit there, or move? My cat can't stand having a blanked on top of her most of the time (that's not my cat in the picture btw - my cat is a gray tabby)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Sat Aug 04, 2012 7:46 pm 
θεά
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:06 pm
Posts: 3063
Location: Northbrook, IL
TAO wrote:
Lol. Does he just sit there, or move? My cat can't stand having a blanked on top of her most of the time (that's not my cat in the picture btw - my cat is a gray tabby)

I'll be trying to make the bed and he'll just lay there defiantly like, "You think I'm moving for that? Think again!" So I just toss the sheets and blanket over the top of him. And he seems to like it because he tends to stay under them.

Funny story: I was staying as a guest in someone's home once, and this woman had the most skiddish cat I had ever met. Like, I only saw this cat 3-4 times in the entire month we stayed there, it was so good at staying out of sight. One day I was looking for my daughter's purple Teletubby plush toy, and I saw a lump under the covers of the bed in one of the guest rooms. I thought, "Oh, my daughter must have been playing in there, and that's her Teletubby under the covers." I moved over to the bed and touched the bump.

That bump shot across the bed like lightning. I screamed. And for just a fraction of a second, my terrified brain decided that my daughter's Teletubby had come alive.

Then I realized it was the stupid cat.

_________________
My Blogs: ClobberBlog | Προστάτις | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:06 am 
God

Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2011 9:43 pm
Posts: 1633
Let's see just how principled Ms. Jack really is.

Darth J:

Quote:
Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.

_________________
Truth will prevail.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 5:23 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:23 am
Posts: 5554
RayAgostini wrote:
MsJack wrote:
This is what's known as mansplainin', Ray, and it officially makes me think less of you. Who do you think you are to tell me what is and is not "necessary" when a man is aggressively sexualizing the women he engages? Especially when you never lifted a finger in protest? On top of this, I recall you flipping a gasket and becoming quite upset when a member of this forum called your daughters "crack whores."


It sounds like a nice story, but the problem is that no one on "this forum" ever called my daughters "crack whores". So you must have false memory syndrome, or something.
Darth J wrote:
You know, I was just thinking the other day that lately on the board there are not nearly enough lunatic, substance-free rants that misrepresent what people say. How fortunate that Ray has shown up to remedy that situation.



Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.




RayAgostini wrote:
Let's see just how principled Ms. Jack really is.

Darth J:

Quote:
Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.


He's kind of teasing you, Ray. Are you really upset by this?

_________________
Christopher Ralph: The discovery that the creators of South Park place a higher value on historical authenticity than do the Brethren creates spiritual shock-waves from which some members never recover.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:01 am 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 10839
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
Chap wrote:
Quote:
Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.


He's kind of teasing you, Ray. Are you really upset by this?


Since it was Darth J, his board arch-nemesis, who did this, you'd better believe he is upset.

_________________
"There seems little of Sméagol left in Kishkumen these days; it's pretty much all Gollum. "~DCP
"Danpologetics is the Sea Org of Mormontology."~LDSToronto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 6:32 am 
God
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 4:23 am
Posts: 5554
Chap wrote:
Quote:
Your daughters are crack whores, Ray.


He's kind of teasing you, Ray. Are you really upset by this?


Kishkumen wrote:

Since it was Darth J, his board arch-nemesis, who did this, you'd better believe he is upset.


OK. So it appears that MsJack got it about right:

MsJack wrote:
This is what's known as mansplainin', Ray, and it officially makes me think less of you. Who do you think you are to tell me what is and is not "necessary" when a man is aggressively sexualizing the women he engages? Especially when you never lifted a finger in protest? On top of this, I recall you flipping a gasket and becoming quite upset when a member of this forum called your daughters "crack whores."

_________________
Christopher Ralph: The discovery that the creators of South Park place a higher value on historical authenticity than do the Brethren creates spiritual shock-waves from which some members never recover.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:01 am 
Seedy Academician
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 10839
Location: The Brutus Memorial Rectory at Cassius University
Chap wrote:
OK. So it appears that MsJack got it about right:

MsJack wrote:
This is what's known as mansplainin', Ray, and it officially makes me think less of you. Who do you think you are to tell me what is and is not "necessary" when a man is aggressively sexualizing the women he engages? Especially when you never lifted a finger in protest? On top of this, I recall you flipping a gasket and becoming quite upset when a member of this forum called your daughters "crack whores."


The problem, in Ray's view, is that Jack is not devoting a thread to decrying the evils of Darth J to get him punted from the Institute for Advanced Anti-Mormon Criticisms, for which he was preparing a manuscript. You know, since these situations are perfectly parallel in every way.

_________________
"There seems little of Sméagol left in Kishkumen these days; it's pretty much all Gollum. "~DCP
"Danpologetics is the Sea Org of Mormontology."~LDSToronto


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:16 am 
θεά
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:06 pm
Posts: 3063
Location: Northbrook, IL
I don't approve of Darth J calling Ray's daughters "crack whores." I recognize that it was a tongue-in-cheek gesture meant to prove a point: that Ray A believes the women in his own life are worth defending and speaking up for, but women like Emma Smith and the female members of this forum aren't. And he proved that point. I still don't think that he should have done it. If it really bothers Ray, he should use his report button and have it removed, since attacking family members of participants is against the rules of the forum.

I won't be doing a "Criticism of Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of Darth J" thread because I haven't seen repeated and consistent misogyny from Darth J, plus Darth J isn't planning on publishing in any academic journals anytime soon.

_________________
My Blogs: ClobberBlog | Προστάτις | Worlds Without End: A Mormon Studies Roundtable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:39 am 
Dark Lord of the Sith
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2010 6:16 pm
Posts: 10075
Location: Cassius University, Department of Cynicism
I see that Ray has taken umbrage at a vulgar, sexualized comment about his daughters. This must mean that:

1. Ray is assassinating my character; or
2. Ray is simply furthering his agenda; or
3. Ray is terrified that my compelling theories will see the light of day; or
4. Ray hates everyone who shares any common beliefs with me; or
5. All of the above.

Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

_________________
Some things that are useful are not very true.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:46 pm 
Founder & Visionary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:07 pm
Posts: 9380
Location: Shady Acres Status: MODERATOR
Darth J wrote:
Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

Don't worry, I don't think you called anyone a crack whore. I'm pretty sure one of the moderators here edited your post to make it look like you called someone a crack whore.

_________________
"I think the FLDS women and children understand their roles and their responsibilities and thus see no need to lobby for rights."

--Fence Sitter, 01/25/2013


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:50 pm 
\m/ \m/
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:52 am
Posts: 9613
Location: Mixed Metaphors Mezzanine
Dr. Shades wrote:
Darth J wrote:
Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

Don't worry, I don't think you called anyone a crack whore. I'm pretty sure one of the moderators here edited your post to make it look like you called someone a crack whore.

Which of the Mod Squad has such a diabolical mind?

_________________
faith is what religious people talk about and really promote when they have no evidence-Jason Bourne

we try to argue that faith is something different than it is in an attempt to legitimatize it-cinepro

Mormons need to grow up and repent of adolescent arrogance-The once and future prophet


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Mormon Apologetics & Misogyny: The Case of William Schry
PostPosted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:57 pm 
God
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 3:42 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sealab
Dr. Shades wrote:
Darth J wrote:
Oh, and I've also re-read what I said, and I am confident that no objective, reasonable person would find it offensive to refer to a female as a crack whore.

Don't worry, I don't think you called anyone a crack whore. I'm pretty sure one of the moderators here edited your post to make it look like you called someone a crack whore.


Plus it's only like .001% of all his posts, so he has a pretty good track record.

_________________
"The Sunday School answers really are the best answers." Addams, Emma. "Sunday School Answers." Ensign. Oct 2012


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1610 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arrakis, Bing [Bot], Cicero, EAllusion, Google [Bot], Jaybear, Sethbag, Tobin and 24 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Revival Theme By Brandon Designs By B.Design-Studio © 2007-2008 Brandon
Revival Theme Based off SubLite By Echo © 2007-2008 Echo
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group