Doctor Scratch wrote:
Welcome back, Doctor Peterson. I'm glad to see you here. It gives me the opportunity to encourage you to take up young LoaP's suggestions about a blog posting that "prove" how my critique of you is off-base. I'd love to see you attempt such a thing. Of course, you and I both know that you'll never ever do this, mainly because you can't.
I received a brief PM from Dr. Peterson in which [contents of private message(s) deleted]
. He also included the PM that [contents of private message(s) deleted]
. Yes, Dr. Peterson knows who I am, as does Blair Hodges (LOaP) and a number of other people.
I appreciate Dr. Peterson's decision to remove this information from the thread. I only wish that others had been more circumspect. Then, there probably would be no need for a "ministry to the Mopologists."
I have to say that I share Dr. Peterson's [contents of private message(s) deleted]
. I am disappointed that [tangental contents of private message(s) deleted]
, but the loads of crap that idiots like Nomad, Pahoran, and Will Schryver post on a routine basis evidently are considered all in good fun.
Gee, no wonder Reverend Kishkumen thinks nothing of critiquing certain apologists and apologetic tactics. It seems someone
ought to do it. As soon as more qualified parties step up to the plate and respond to Elder Ballard's admonitions, maybe the Right Reverend will go into permanent retirement. The Reverend wishes no one ill, but he doesn't feel much compunction about criticizing apologetics that, on account of their deficiencies, demand criticism.
That is not exactly the same thing as criticizing the LDS Church.