Ya got to be meticulous about anything in the context of Paul O, because he is of such a specific posting style that cannot be seperated to mean anything other than one thing if you refer to Paul's "toys" or even his "tool". Obviously you can see that can't you?
Droopy's tap dancing so fast his feet are getting tangled up. He already admitted his reference to Paul was intended to be sexual:
Droopy, from page 1:
"Paul's toys" are indeed allusions to his continual obsession with sex, masturbation, liquor, sinning, and dong every in-your-face thing he can think of the would offend the teachings and standards of the Church ("toys" are his "tools" or "methods" in other words).
So, he admits that "Paul's toys" is a sexual reference. He then says "get ready for a long grind", which, following the clearly sexual reference to Paul's toys, is another obvious sexual reference. Then he calls me a "bad girl" in the same verse that, so far, contained explicit sexual references.
And he expects anyone to believe it wasn't a sexual innuendo?
Indeed pathetic. All of it. I'm not sure which is more pathetic of the following two options:
1 - Droopy is aware, as any reasonable adult would be, of the sexual innuendo, but just refuses to admit it because he's, well, Droopy.
2 - Droopy truly is unaware of the clear sexual innuendo, as he is unaware of his numerous other sexual innuendos towards women posters on this site. Why would he be in such a state of denial? Obviously his religious beliefs would frown upon making sexual innuendos towards women, and yet he can't help himself. There are a couple of possibilities why he can't help himself, and none of them are flattering. But he cannot bring himself to recognize that he can't help himself and behaves contra his religious convictions, so he remains in denial.